2011•The Journal of Clinical AnesthesiologyRequires access

Clinical use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in the embolization of intracranial aneurysms

Fang Kang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical application of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in the embolization of intracranial aneurysms under combined intravenous and inhalational anesthesia.Methods Forty patients scheduled for interventional therapy of intracranial aneurysm were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=20 each). After anesthesia induction, PLMA was inserted in group L without muscle relaxants while rocuronium was administered to facilitate intubation of endotracheal tube (ETT) in group T. Both groups were maintained with sevoflurane inhalation and target controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil. SBP, DBP and HR were recorded before and after anesthesia induction, right after the insertion of PLMA or ETT, at the cessation of the procedure, and after removal of PLMA or ETT. The time for return of spontaneous breathing, the extubation time, the occurrence of adverse effects such as coughing and pharyngodynia, and anesthetic dosages used were also recorded.Results Perioperative hemodynamics was more stable, consumption of propofol and remifentanil was less, emergence from anesthesia was faster, and occurrence of pharyngodynia was fewer in group L than that in group T(P0.05). Conclusion PLMA is superior to endotracheal intubation in the embolization of intracranial aneurysms in terms of easy placement, reliable ventilation, less irritation, better hemodynamic profiles, faster emergence and less adverse effects.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the clinical application of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in the embolization of intracranial aneurysms under combined intravenous and inhalational anesthesia.Methods Forty patients scheduled for interventional therapy of intracranial aneurysm were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=20 each). After anesthesia induction, PLMA was inserted in group L without muscle relaxants while rocuronium was administered to facilitate intubation of endotracheal tube (ETT) in group T. Both groups were maintained with sevoflurane inhalation and target controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil. SBP, DBP and HR were recorded before and after anesthesia induction, right after the insertion of PLMA or ETT, at the cessation of the procedure, and after removal of PLMA or ETT. The time for return of spontaneous breathing, the extubation time, the occurrence of adverse effects such as coughing and pharyngodynia, and anesthetic dosages used were also recorded.Results Perioperative hemodynamics was more stable, consumption of propofol and remifentanil was less, emergence from anesthesia was faster, and occurrence of pharyngodynia was fewer in group L than that in group T(P0.05). Conclusion PLMA is superior to endotracheal intubation in the embolization of intracranial aneurysms in terms of easy placement, reliable ventilation, less irritation, better hemodynamic profiles, faster emergence and less adverse effects.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical application of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in the embolization of intracranial aneurysms under combined intravenous and inhalational anesthesia.Methods Forty patients scheduled for interventional therapy of intracranial aneurysm were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=20 each). After anesthesia induction, PLMA was inserted in group L without muscle relaxants while rocuronium was administered to facilitate intubation of endotracheal tube (ETT) in group T. Both groups were maintained with sevoflurane inhalation and target controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil. SBP, DBP and HR were recorded before and after anesthesia induction, right after the insertion of PLMA or ETT, at the cessation of the procedure, and after removal of PLMA or ETT. The time for return of spontaneous breathing, the extubation time, the occurrence of adverse effects such as coughing and pharyngodynia, and anesthetic dosages used were also recorded.Results Perioperative hemodynamics was more stable, consumption of propofol and remifentanil was less, emergence from anesthesia was faster, and occurrence of pharyngodynia was fewer in group L than that in group T(P0.05). Conclusion PLMA is superior to endotracheal intubation in the embolization of intracranial aneurysms in terms of easy placement, reliable ventilation, less irritation, better hemodynamic profiles, faster emergence and less adverse effects.

Key concepts: Medicine, Anesthesia, Remifentanil, Propofol, Rocuronium, Sevoflurane, Laryngeal mask airway, Embolization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in the embolization of intracranial aneurysms — Research Paper | ScholarLens