Comparison of converting efficacy and safety of intravenous ibutilide and propafenone in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter
Yishi Li
Abstract
Yishi Li
Abstract
Objective: To compare converting efficacies of intravenous ibutilide and propafenone on atrial fibrillation(AF) and artial flutter(AFL) in Chinese patients in a prospective study.Methods: We investigated 200 AF and AFL patients treated with ibutilide(1 mg,or 0.01 mg·kg-1 if body weight 60 kg,iv) or propafenone(70 mg,iv,repeated if necessary) in the randomized and controlled study.A second infusion was performed 10 min later if first infusion failed.Results: Overall,ibutilide had a higher cardioversion rate(55%,55/100) than propafenone(21%,21/100).Ibutilide converted more patients to sinus rhythm in patients with either AF [50%(40/79) vs 24%(21/90)] or AFL [71%(15/21) vs 0%].The RR intervals were not statistically different between AF and AFL during conversion.One torsade de pointes(TdP,1%) developed in ibutilide group and was converted by direct current electrical conversion.Conclusion: Ibutilide is more effective than propafenone in converting AF or AFL in Chinese patients.Adverse events are not significantly different between ibutilide and propafenone.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: To compare converting efficacies of intravenous ibutilide and propafenone on atrial fibrillation(AF) and artial flutter(AFL) in Chinese patients in a prospective study.Methods: We investigated 200 AF and AFL patients treated with ibutilide(1 mg,or 0.01 mg·kg-1 if body weight 60 kg,iv) or propafenone(70 mg,iv,repeated if necessary) in the randomized and controlled study.A second infusion was performed 10 min later if first infusion failed.Results: Overall,ibutilide had a higher cardioversion rate(55%,55/100) than propafenone(21%,21/100).Ibutilide converted more patients to sinus rhythm in patients with either AF [50%(40/79) vs 24%(21/90)] or AFL [71%(15/21) vs 0%].The RR intervals were not statistically different between AF and AFL during conversion.One torsade de pointes(TdP,1%) developed in ibutilide group and was converted by direct current electrical conversion.Conclusion: Ibutilide is more effective than propafenone in converting AF or AFL in Chinese patients.Adverse events are not significantly different between ibutilide and propafenone.
Key concepts: Ibutilide, Propafenone, Medicine, Atrial flutter, Atrial fibrillation, Cardioversion, Cardiology, Internal medicine