2002•Journal of Zhejiang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)Requires access

The Realistic Choice of Standard of Proof in Criminal Procedure:Mixed Standard

Fang Ruan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

There are two opposite viewpoints on standard of proof in criminal procedure: the objective truth doctrine and the legal truth doctrine. Both viewpoints fail to wholly grasp the double phases and attributes of proof in criminal procedure and so are unilateral. The standard based on objective truth is the most ideal standard of proof. However, the present conditions in China are not good enough for us to adopt the standard solely based on objective truth. It seems that the realistic choice is to adopt the mixed standard based on both objective truth and legal truth. Since the transformation is bound to occur from legal truth to objective truth, we should make efforts to gradually accomplish the transition from the mixed standard to the standard solely based on objective truth.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There are two opposite viewpoints on standard of proof in criminal procedure: the objective truth doctrine and the legal truth doctrine. Both viewpoints fail to wholly grasp the double phases and attributes of proof in criminal procedure and so are unilateral. The standard based on objective truth is the most ideal standard of proof. However, the present conditions in China are not good enough for us to adopt the standard solely based on objective truth. It seems that the realistic choice is to adopt the mixed standard based on both objective truth and legal truth. Since the transformation is bound to occur from legal truth to objective truth, we should make efforts to gradually accomplish the transition from the mixed standard to the standard solely based on objective truth.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There are two opposite viewpoints on standard of proof in criminal procedure: the objective truth doctrine and the legal truth doctrine. Both viewpoints fail to wholly grasp the double phases and attributes of proof in criminal procedure and so are unilateral. The standard based on objective truth is the most ideal standard of proof. However, the present conditions in China are not good enough for us to adopt the standard solely based on objective truth. It seems that the realistic choice is to adopt the mixed standard based on both objective truth and legal truth. Since the transformation is bound to occur from legal truth to objective truth, we should make efforts to gradually accomplish the transition from the mixed standard to the standard solely based on objective truth.

Key concepts: Viewpoints, Doctrine, GRASP, Law, Computer science, Political science, Programming language, Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Realistic Choice of Standard of Proof in Criminal Procedure:Mixed Standard — Research Paper | ScholarLens