2008PubMedRequires access

[FOLFOX4 regimen versus DP(O)F regimen for advanced gastric cancer].

Fang Wu, Honggang Zhang, Fei-Wu Ran, Xiangru Zhang, Yuankai Shi

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Currently, there is no standard regimen for advanced gastric cancer. FOLFOX4 regimen [oxaliplatin(L-OHP) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)] and DP(O)F regimen [docetaxel (TXT), oxaliplatin (L-OHP)/cisplatin (DDP) with 5-FU] are usually used in treating gastric cancer with satisfactory efficacy. This study was to compare the efficacy, time to disease progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and toxicity of the two regimens for advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Clinical data of 70 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced gastric cancer were analyzed. Of the 70 patients, 34 were treated with FOLFOX4 regimen, 36 were treated with DP(O)F regimen. The patients in FOLFOX4 group received intravenous infusion of L-OHP (85 mg/m(2)) at Day 1, bolus injection of 5-FU (400 mg/m(2)) at Days 1-2, and continuous intravenous infusion of 5-FU (600 mg/m(2)) for 22 h at Days 1-2; 14 days as one cycle. The patients in DP(O)F group received administration of TXT [20 mg x (m2 x w)(-1)], intravenous infusion of DDP (40 mg/m(2)) at Days 2-3 or L-OHP (100 mg/m(2)) at Day 2, and intravenous infusion of 5-FU (500 mg/m(2)) at Days 1-5; 21 days as one cycle. RESULTS: The objective response rates were 45.4% in FOLFOX4 group and 52.8% in DP(O)F group (P=0.628). The median TTP was 5.27 months in FOLFOX4 group and 4.70 months in DP(O)F group (P=0.848). The median survival time was 8.97 months in FOLFOX4 group and 12.17 months in DP(O)F group (P=0.095). The most frequent adverse events were nausea, vomit and hematologic toxicities. The occurrence rates of grade III-IV leukopenia and neutropenia were significantly lower in FOLFOX4 group than in DP(O)F group (11.8% vs. 36.1%, P=0.025; 17.6% vs. 41.7%, P=0.038). One patient in FOLFOX4 group died of liver function failure. CONCLUSION: Both FOLFOX4 and DP(O)F regimens are effective in treating advanced gastric cancer. The hematologic toxicities of DP(O)F regimen are worse than those of FOLFOX4 regimen.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Currently, there is no standard regimen for advanced gastric cancer. FOLFOX4 regimen [oxaliplatin(L-OHP) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)] and DP(O)F regimen [docetaxel (TXT), oxaliplatin (L-OHP)/cisplatin (DDP) with 5-FU] are usually used in treating gastric cancer with satisfactory efficacy. This study was to compare the efficacy, time to disease progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and toxicity of the two regimens for advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Clinical data of 70 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced gastric cancer were analyzed. Of the 70 patients, 34 were treated with FOLFOX4 regimen, 36 were treated with DP(O)F regimen. The patients in FOLFOX4 group received intravenous infusion of L-OHP (85 mg/m(2)) at Day 1, bolus injection of 5-FU (400 mg/m(2)) at Days 1-2, and continuous intravenous infusion of 5-FU (600 mg/m(2)) for 22 h at Days 1-2; 14 days as one cycle. The patients in DP(O)F group received administration of TXT [20 mg x (m2 x w)(-1)], intravenous infusion of DDP (40 mg/m(2)) at Days 2-3 or L-OHP (100 mg/m(2)) at Day 2, and intravenous infusion of 5-FU (500 mg/m(2)) at Days 1-5; 21 days as one cycle. RESULTS: The objective response rates were 45.4% in FOLFOX4 group and 52.8% in DP(O)F group (P=0.628). The median TTP was 5.27 months in FOLFOX4 group and 4.70 months in DP(O)F group (P=0.848). The median survival time was 8.97 months in FOLFOX4 group and 12.17 months in DP(O)F group (P=0.095). The most frequent adverse events were nausea, vomit and hematologic toxicities. The occurrence rates of grade III-IV leukopenia and neutropenia were significantly lower in FOLFOX4 group than in DP(O)F group (11.8% vs. 36.1%, P=0.025; 17.6% vs. 41.7%, P=0.038). One patient in FOLFOX4 group died of liver function failure. CONCLUSION: Both FOLFOX4 and DP(O)F regimens are effective in treating advanced gastric cancer. The hematologic toxicities of DP(O)F regimen are worse than those of FOLFOX4 regimen.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Currently, there is no standard regimen for advanced gastric cancer. FOLFOX4 regimen [oxaliplatin(L-OHP) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)] and DP(O)F regimen [docetaxel (TXT), oxaliplatin (L-OHP)/cisplatin (DDP) with 5-FU] are usually used in treating gastric cancer with satisfactory efficacy. This study was to compare the efficacy, time to disease progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and toxicity of the two regimens for advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Clinical data of 70 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced gastric cancer were analyzed. Of the 70 patients, 34 were treated with FOLFOX4 regimen, 36 were treated with DP(O)F regimen. The patients in FOLFOX4 group received intravenous infusion of L-OHP (85 mg/m(2)) at Day 1, bolus injection of 5-FU (400 mg/m(2)) at Days 1-2, and continuous intravenous infusion of 5-FU (600 mg/m(2)) for 22 h at Days 1-2; 14 days as one cycle. The patients in DP(O)F group received administration of TXT [20 mg x (m2 x w)(-1)], intravenous infusion of DDP (40 mg/m(2)) at Days 2-3 or L-OHP (100 mg/m(2)) at Day 2, and intravenous infusion of 5-FU (500 mg/m(2)) at Days 1-5; 21 days as one cycle. RESULTS: The objective response rates were 45.4% in FOLFOX4 group and 52.8% in DP(O)F group (P=0.628). The median TTP was 5.27 months in FOLFOX4 group and 4.70 months in DP(O)F group (P=0.848). The median survival time was 8.97 months in FOLFOX4 group and 12.17 months in DP(O)F group (P=0.095). The most frequent adverse events were nausea, vomit and hematologic toxicities. The occurrence rates of grade III-IV leukopenia and neutropenia were significantly lower in FOLFOX4 group than in DP(O)F group (11.8% vs. 36.1%, P=0.025; 17.6% vs. 41.7%, P=0.038). One patient in FOLFOX4 group died of liver function failure. CONCLUSION: Both FOLFOX4 and DP(O)F regimens are effective in treating advanced gastric cancer. The hematologic toxicities of DP(O)F regimen are worse than those of FOLFOX4 regimen.

Key concepts: Regimen, Oxaliplatin, Medicine, Bolus (digestion), Gastroenterology, Fluorouracil, Docetaxel, Chemotherapy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[FOLFOX4 regimen versus DP(O)F regimen for advanced gastric cancer]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens