2011China Medical HeraldRequires access

Comparison between Sevoflurane and Propofol recovery from anesthesia in gynecological laparoscopical surgery

Liu Huijin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare recovery in the gynecological laparoscopic surgery with Sevoflurane-inhalation anesthesia with Remifentanil and Propofol-Remifentanil intravenous anesthesia.Methods:ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ class scheduled for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery,50 cases were randomly divided into Sevoflurane-Remifentanil inhalation anesthesia group(M group) and Propofol-Remifentanil intravenous anesthesia group(N group) in 25 cases.Anesthesia effect of two groups were recorded and compared.Results:The incidence of nausea in adverse events in M group of 36% compared with 8% in N group was significant(χ2=4.20,P0.05),the incidence of nausea of M group was higher than that of N group.Recovery time of spontaneous breathing,M group was(6.30±0.80) min,N group with(7.90±0.86) min,t=-6.79,P0.01;eye opening,M group was(7.40±0.87) min,N group with(9.20±1.00) min,t=-6.64,P0.01,extubation time:M group was(9.30±0.84) min,N group with(10.90±0.88) min,t=-6.56,P0.01;recovery time of orientation:M group was(10.80±1.21) min,N group with(12.60±1.50) min,t=-4.45,P0.01;Therefore,in the M group and N group recovery time of spontaneous breathing,eye opening,tracheal extubation,orientation and other aspects of the recovery time was statistically significant,Sevoflurane-Remifentanil anesthesia had significant advantages.Conclusion:Sevoflurane-Remifentanil anesthesia in gynecological laparoscopic surgery may provide satisfactory anesthesia,rapid recovery after surgery,recovery of high quality,is an ideal method of anesthesia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare recovery in the gynecological laparoscopic surgery with Sevoflurane-inhalation anesthesia with Remifentanil and Propofol-Remifentanil intravenous anesthesia.Methods:ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ class scheduled for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery,50 cases were randomly divided into Sevoflurane-Remifentanil inhalation anesthesia group(M group) and Propofol-Remifentanil intravenous anesthesia group(N group) in 25 cases.Anesthesia effect of two groups were recorded and compared.Results:The incidence of nausea in adverse events in M group of 36% compared with 8% in N group was significant(χ2=4.20,P0.05),the incidence of nausea of M group was higher than that of N group.Recovery time of spontaneous breathing,M group was(6.30±0.80) min,N group with(7.90±0.86) min,t=-6.79,P0.01;eye opening,M group was(7.40±0.87) min,N group with(9.20±1.00) min,t=-6.64,P0.01,extubation time:M group was(9.30±0.84) min,N group with(10.90±0.88) min,t=-6.56,P0.01;recovery time of orientation:M group was(10.80±1.21) min,N group with(12.60±1.50) min,t=-4.45,P0.01;Therefore,in the M group and N group recovery time of spontaneous breathing,eye opening,tracheal extubation,orientation and other aspects of the recovery time was statistically significant,Sevoflurane-Remifentanil anesthesia had significant advantages.Conclusion:Sevoflurane-Remifentanil anesthesia in gynecological laparoscopic surgery may provide satisfactory anesthesia,rapid recovery after surgery,recovery of high quality,is an ideal method of anesthesia.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare recovery in the gynecological laparoscopic surgery with Sevoflurane-inhalation anesthesia with Remifentanil and Propofol-Remifentanil intravenous anesthesia.Methods:ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ class scheduled for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery,50 cases were randomly divided into Sevoflurane-Remifentanil inhalation anesthesia group(M group) and Propofol-Remifentanil intravenous anesthesia group(N group) in 25 cases.Anesthesia effect of two groups were recorded and compared.Results:The incidence of nausea in adverse events in M group of 36% compared with 8% in N group was significant(χ2=4.20,P0.05),the incidence of nausea of M group was higher than that of N group.Recovery time of spontaneous breathing,M group was(6.30±0.80) min,N group with(7.90±0.86) min,t=-6.79,P0.01;eye opening,M group was(7.40±0.87) min,N group with(9.20±1.00) min,t=-6.64,P0.01,extubation time:M group was(9.30±0.84) min,N group with(10.90±0.88) min,t=-6.56,P0.01;recovery time of orientation:M group was(10.80±1.21) min,N group with(12.60±1.50) min,t=-4.45,P0.01;Therefore,in the M group and N group recovery time of spontaneous breathing,eye opening,tracheal extubation,orientation and other aspects of the recovery time was statistically significant,Sevoflurane-Remifentanil anesthesia had significant advantages.Conclusion:Sevoflurane-Remifentanil anesthesia in gynecological laparoscopic surgery may provide satisfactory anesthesia,rapid recovery after surgery,recovery of high quality,is an ideal method of anesthesia.

Key concepts: Remifentanil, Medicine, Anesthesia, Sevoflurane, Propofol, Nausea, Inhalation, Laparoscopic surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between Sevoflurane and Propofol recovery from anesthesia in gynecological laparoscopical surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens