2013PubMedRequires access

[Analysis of the factors for predicting the outcomes of interferon-α and entecavir treatments for chronic hepatitis B with positive HBeAg].

Zhiwei Xie, Fuyuan Zhou, Yuanping Zhou

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the predictive factors of the therapeutic effects of interferons (IFNs) and entecavir (ETV) treatments for 48 weeks in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) positive for HBeAg. METHODS: This retrospective analysis compared the treatment efficacy of IFNs and ETV in 129 CHB patients positive for HBeAg. Twenty-seven of the patients were treated with PEG-IFNα-2a (180 µg once a week, PEG-IFN group), 51 patients with conventional IFNα (5 MIU three times a week, IFN group), and 51 with ETV (0.5 mg once daily, ETV group) for 48 weeks. RESULTS: After completion of the treatment cycles, the patients in ETV group showed a significantly higher HBV DNA undetectable rate and a significantly lower HBeAg seroconversion rate than those in PEG-IFN and IFN groups (P<0.05); HBeAg seroconversion rates were similar between PEG-IFN group and IFN group (Χ(2)=0.709, P=0.400). In PEG-IFN and ETV groups, HBeAg seroconversion rates were not associated with age, gender, baseline HBeAg, baseline HBV DNA and baseline ALT. In IFN group, HBeAg seroconversion rates were associated with baseline HBeAg (P=0.048) but not with age, gender, baseline HBV DNA and baseline ALT. In PEG-IFNα-2a group, ROC analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity of HBeAg seroconversion at 48 weeks were 0.778 and 0.889, respectively, when the decline rate of HBeAg between baseline and week 24 exceeded 97.81%, with the corresponding positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of 0.778 and 0.889, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of HBeAg seroconversion at 48 weeks were 0.889 and 0.722, respectively, when the decline rate of HBeAg between week 12 and week 24 was over 42.75%, with the corresponding PPV and NPV of 0.615 and 0.929, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatments with PEG-IFNα-2a and conventional IFNα for 48 weeks can achieve a higher HBeAg seroconversion rate than ETV, but the latter produces a higher HBV DNA undetectable rate. For PEG-IFNα-2a treatment, the decline rate of HBeAg between baseline and week 24 over 97.81% is the best predicting factor for HBeAg seroconversion at week 48 in CHB patients positive for HBeAg.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the predictive factors of the therapeutic effects of interferons (IFNs) and entecavir (ETV) treatments for 48 weeks in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) positive for HBeAg. METHODS: This retrospective analysis compared the treatment efficacy of IFNs and ETV in 129 CHB patients positive for HBeAg. Twenty-seven of the patients were treated with PEG-IFNα-2a (180 µg once a week, PEG-IFN group), 51 patients with conventional IFNα (5 MIU three times a week, IFN group), and 51 with ETV (0.5 mg once daily, ETV group) for 48 weeks. RESULTS: After completion of the treatment cycles, the patients in ETV group showed a significantly higher HBV DNA undetectable rate and a significantly lower HBeAg seroconversion rate than those in PEG-IFN and IFN groups (P<0.05); HBeAg seroconversion rates were similar between PEG-IFN group and IFN group (Χ(2)=0.709, P=0.400). In PEG-IFN and ETV groups, HBeAg seroconversion rates were not associated with age, gender, baseline HBeAg, baseline HBV DNA and baseline ALT. In IFN group, HBeAg seroconversion rates were associated with baseline HBeAg (P=0.048) but not with age, gender, baseline HBV DNA and baseline ALT. In PEG-IFNα-2a group, ROC analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity of HBeAg seroconversion at 48 weeks were 0.778 and 0.889, respectively, when the decline rate of HBeAg between baseline and week 24 exceeded 97.81%, with the corresponding positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of 0.778 and 0.889, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of HBeAg seroconversion at 48 weeks were 0.889 and 0.722, respectively, when the decline rate of HBeAg between week 12 and week 24 was over 42.75%, with the corresponding PPV and NPV of 0.615 and 0.929, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatments with PEG-IFNα-2a and conventional IFNα for 48 weeks can achieve a higher HBeAg seroconversion rate than ETV, but the latter produces a higher HBV DNA undetectable rate. For PEG-IFNα-2a treatment, the decline rate of HBeAg between baseline and week 24 over 97.81% is the best predicting factor for HBeAg seroconversion at week 48 in CHB patients positive for HBeAg.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the predictive factors of the therapeutic effects of interferons (IFNs) and entecavir (ETV) treatments for 48 weeks in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) positive for HBeAg. METHODS: This retrospective analysis compared the treatment efficacy of IFNs and ETV in 129 CHB patients positive for HBeAg. Twenty-seven of the patients were treated with PEG-IFNα-2a (180 µg once a week, PEG-IFN group), 51 patients with conventional IFNα (5 MIU three times a week, IFN group), and 51 with ETV (0.5 mg once daily, ETV group) for 48 weeks. RESULTS: After completion of the treatment cycles, the patients in ETV group showed a significantly higher HBV DNA undetectable rate and a significantly lower HBeAg seroconversion rate than those in PEG-IFN and IFN groups (P<0.05); HBeAg seroconversion rates were similar between PEG-IFN group and IFN group (Χ(2)=0.709, P=0.400). In PEG-IFN and ETV groups, HBeAg seroconversion rates were not associated with age, gender, baseline HBeAg, baseline HBV DNA and baseline ALT. In IFN group, HBeAg seroconversion rates were associated with baseline HBeAg (P=0.048) but not with age, gender, baseline HBV DNA and baseline ALT. In PEG-IFNα-2a group, ROC analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity of HBeAg seroconversion at 48 weeks were 0.778 and 0.889, respectively, when the decline rate of HBeAg between baseline and week 24 exceeded 97.81%, with the corresponding positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of 0.778 and 0.889, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of HBeAg seroconversion at 48 weeks were 0.889 and 0.722, respectively, when the decline rate of HBeAg between week 12 and week 24 was over 42.75%, with the corresponding PPV and NPV of 0.615 and 0.929, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatments with PEG-IFNα-2a and conventional IFNα for 48 weeks can achieve a higher HBeAg seroconversion rate than ETV, but the latter produces a higher HBV DNA undetectable rate. For PEG-IFNα-2a treatment, the decline rate of HBeAg between baseline and week 24 over 97.81% is the best predicting factor for HBeAg seroconversion at week 48 in CHB patients positive for HBeAg.

Key concepts: HBeAg, Seroconversion, Medicine, Entecavir, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Hepatitis B virus, Hepatitis B

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Analysis of the factors for predicting the outcomes of interferon-α and entecavir treatments for chronic hepatitis B with positive HBeAg]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens