2013Xiandai yufang yixueRequires access

Research on clinical effect and bond failure of self-ligating and MBT brackets

Liu Ming-yin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical effect of self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets on arch expansion,the rate of bond failure and periodontal condition.METHODS 30 patients were divided into 2 groups(observation group:15 patients with self-ligating brackets and control group:15 patients with MBT brackets).The clinical effect on arch expansion,rate of bond failure and periodontal indices(PLI,GI and SBI)were recorded in both group before and after 6 months of treatment.RESULTS ① There were no obvious differences in the anterior dental arch widths and length between two groups.But compared with control group,the effect on the increase of the mid-length of maxillary after treatment was different in observation group(P﹤0.05).② After 6 months treatment,gum inflammation,dental plaque were in patients in both groups,but PLI,GI,SBI were not different between two groups(P﹥0.05).③ Failure rate of brackets was 12/300(4.0%)in observation group,14/300(4.7%)in control group.No difference in failure incidence was noted for self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets(P﹥0.05).CONCLUSION Self-ligating brackets has the same clinical effect and bond failure compared to MBT brackets,and do not have an advantage over the periodontal status.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical effect of self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets on arch expansion,the rate of bond failure and periodontal condition.METHODS 30 patients were divided into 2 groups(observation group:15 patients with self-ligating brackets and control group:15 patients with MBT brackets).The clinical effect on arch expansion,rate of bond failure and periodontal indices(PLI,GI and SBI)were recorded in both group before and after 6 months of treatment.RESULTS ① There were no obvious differences in the anterior dental arch widths and length between two groups.But compared with control group,the effect on the increase of the mid-length of maxillary after treatment was different in observation group(P﹤0.05).② After 6 months treatment,gum inflammation,dental plaque were in patients in both groups,but PLI,GI,SBI were not different between two groups(P﹥0.05).③ Failure rate of brackets was 12/300(4.0%)in observation group,14/300(4.7%)in control group.No difference in failure incidence was noted for self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets(P﹥0.05).CONCLUSION Self-ligating brackets has the same clinical effect and bond failure compared to MBT brackets,and do not have an advantage over the periodontal status.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical effect of self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets on arch expansion,the rate of bond failure and periodontal condition.METHODS 30 patients were divided into 2 groups(observation group:15 patients with self-ligating brackets and control group:15 patients with MBT brackets).The clinical effect on arch expansion,rate of bond failure and periodontal indices(PLI,GI and SBI)were recorded in both group before and after 6 months of treatment.RESULTS ① There were no obvious differences in the anterior dental arch widths and length between two groups.But compared with control group,the effect on the increase of the mid-length of maxillary after treatment was different in observation group(P﹤0.05).② After 6 months treatment,gum inflammation,dental plaque were in patients in both groups,but PLI,GI,SBI were not different between two groups(P﹥0.05).③ Failure rate of brackets was 12/300(4.0%)in observation group,14/300(4.7%)in control group.No difference in failure incidence was noted for self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets(P﹥0.05).CONCLUSION Self-ligating brackets has the same clinical effect and bond failure compared to MBT brackets,and do not have an advantage over the periodontal status.

Key concepts: Dentistry, Medicine, Dental arch, Orthodontics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Research on clinical effect and bond failure of self-ligating and MBT brackets — Research Paper | ScholarLens