2016Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

The Political Economy of European Banking Union

David Howarth, Lucia Quaglia

Open publisher page 280 citations

Abstract

The establishment of Banking Union represents a major development in European economic governance and European integration history more generally. Banking Union is also significant because not all European Union (EU) member states have joined it, which has increased the trend towards differentiated integration in the EU, posing a major challenge to the EU as a whole and to the opt-out countries. This book is informed by two main empirical questions. Why was Banking Union—presented by proponents as a crucial move to ‘complete’ Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)—proposed only in 2012, over twenty years after the adoption of the Maastricht Treaty? Why has a certain design for Banking Union been agreed and some elements of this design prioritized over others? A two-step explanation is articulated in this book. First, it explains why euro area member state governments moved to consider Banking Union by building on the concept of the financial trilemma, and examining the implications of the single currency for euro area members and non-euro area members. Second, it explains the design of Banking Union by examining the preferences of member state governments on the core components of Banking Union concerning supervision, resolution and deposit guarantee and developing a comparative political economy analysis focused on the configuration of national banking systems and concerns related to the moral hazard facing both banks and sovereigns.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The establishment of Banking Union represents a major development in European economic governance and European integration history more generally. Banking Union is also significant because not all European Union (EU) member states have joined it, which has increased the trend towards differentiated integration in the EU, posing a major challenge to the EU as a whole and to the opt-out countries. This book is informed by two main empirical questions. Why was Banking Union—presented by proponents as a crucial move to ‘complete’ Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)—proposed only in 2012, over twenty years after the adoption of the Maastricht Treaty? Why has a certain design for Banking Union been agreed and some elements of this design prioritized over others? A two-step explanation is articulated in this book. First, it explains why euro area member state governments moved to consider Banking Union by building on the concept of the financial trilemma, and examining the implications of the single currency for euro area members and non-euro area members. Second, it explains the design of Banking Union by examining the preferences of member state governments on the core components of Banking Union concerning supervision, resolution and deposit guarantee and developing a comparative political economy analysis focused on the configuration of national banking systems and concerns related to the moral hazard facing both banks and sovereigns.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 280 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The establishment of Banking Union represents a major development in European economic governance and European integration history more generally. Banking Union is also significant because not all European Union (EU) member states have joined it, which has increased the trend towards differentiated integration in the EU, posing a major challenge to the EU as a whole and to the opt-out countries. This book is informed by two main empirical questions. Why was Banking Union—presented by proponents as a crucial move to ‘complete’ Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)—proposed only in 2012, over twenty years after the adoption of the Maastricht Treaty? Why has a certain design for Banking Union been agreed and some elements of this design prioritized over others? A two-step explanation is articulated in this book. First, it explains why euro area member state governments moved to consider Banking Union by building on the concept of the financial trilemma, and examining the implications of the single currency for euro area members and non-euro area members. Second, it explains the design of Banking Union by examining the preferences of member state governments on the core components of Banking Union concerning supervision, resolution and deposit guarantee and developing a comparative political economy analysis focused on the configuration of national banking systems and concerns related to the moral hazard facing both banks and sovereigns.

Key concepts: Banking union, Maastricht Treaty, Political union, European union, Single Euro Payments Area, Economic and monetary union, Treaty, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Political Economy of European Banking Union — Research Paper | ScholarLens