2016•Turkish Journal of Sport and ExerciseOpen access

Correlations between different methods of vertical jump and static balance parameters in athletes

Mehmet Göktepe, Mehmet Günay, Şakir Bezci, Metin Bayram, Ali Özkan

Open full text 9 citations

Abstract

This study aims at determining the correlations between different methods of vertical jumping and static balance. A total of 46 male athletes (handball players 14, volleyball players 13, and soccer players 19) were included in the research. For each participant, the following measurements were made respectively: 1) height and weight measurement, 2) 5-minute warm up run, 3) trial measurements so that participants could adjust to the balance platform, 4) Static balance measurements, 5) jumping measurements; and then the procedure was ended. The “Descriptive” test was employed for numerical variables, and descriptive statistics were represented as averages ± standard deviations. Because parametric test assumptions were not met in analysing the independent variables for the participants, Spearman’s Moments Multiplication Correlation test was used. In consequence, statistically significant correlations were not found between static jump and counter movement jump – vertical jump methods- and static balance parameters (p>0.05). Yet, it may be said that statistically significant correlations are available between drop jump and static balance parameters (p<0.05). It was found that there were significant correlations between static balance and drop jump in athletes, but that there were no significant correlations between static jump and counter movement jump.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study aims at determining the correlations between different methods of vertical jumping and static balance. A total of 46 male athletes (handball players 14, volleyball players 13, and soccer players 19) were included in the research. For each participant, the following measurements were made respectively: 1) height and weight measurement, 2) 5-minute warm up run, 3) trial measurements so that participants could adjust to the balance platform, 4) Static balance measurements, 5) jumping measurements; and then the procedure was ended. The “Descriptive” test was employed for numerical variables, and descriptive statistics were represented as averages ± standard deviations. Because parametric test assumptions were not met in analysing the independent variables for the participants, Spearman’s Moments Multiplication Correlation test was used. In consequence, statistically significant correlations were not found between static jump and counter movement jump – vertical jump methods- and static balance parameters (p>0.05). Yet, it may be said that statistically significant correlations are available between drop jump and static balance parameters (p<0.05). It was found that there were significant correlations between static balance and drop jump in athletes, but that there were no significant correlations between static jump and counter movement jump.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study aims at determining the correlations between different methods of vertical jumping and static balance. A total of 46 male athletes (handball players 14, volleyball players 13, and soccer players 19) were included in the research. For each participant, the following measurements were made respectively: 1) height and weight measurement, 2) 5-minute warm up run, 3) trial measurements so that participants could adjust to the balance platform, 4) Static balance measurements, 5) jumping measurements; and then the procedure was ended. The “Descriptive” test was employed for numerical variables, and descriptive statistics were represented as averages ± standard deviations. Because parametric test assumptions were not met in analysing the independent variables for the participants, Spearman’s Moments Multiplication Correlation test was used. In consequence, statistically significant correlations were not found between static jump and counter movement jump – vertical jump methods- and static balance parameters (p>0.05). Yet, it may be said that statistically significant correlations are available between drop jump and static balance parameters (p<0.05). It was found that there were significant correlations between static balance and drop jump in athletes, but that there were no significant correlations between static jump and counter movement jump.

Key concepts: Vertical jump, Athletes, Jump, Balance (ability), Mathematics, Statistics, Orthodontics, Physical medicine and rehabilitation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Correlations between different methods of vertical jump and static balance parameters in athletes — Research Paper | ScholarLens