ScholarLens Back to search
2016•AddictionOpen access

We still question the utility and validity of the binge/heavy drinking criterion

Matthew R. Pearson, Megan Kirouac, Katie Witkiewitz

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

Commentary to: Questioning the validity of the 4+/5+ binge or heavy drinking criterion in college and clinical populations

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Commentary to: Questioning the validity of the 4+/5+ binge or heavy drinking criterion in college and clinical populations

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Commentary to: Questioning the validity of the 4+/5+ binge or heavy drinking criterion in college and clinical populations

Key concepts: Binge drinking, Heavy drinking, Criterion validity, Psychology, Clinical psychology, Psychiatry, Psychometrics, Social psychology

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
We still question the utility and validity of the binge/heavy drinking criterion — Research Paper | ScholarLens