2014Brunei international medical journalRequires access

Comparison between lignocaine 2% gel and water-based lubricant in reducing post intubation sore throat

SOONG-KEE TEOH, Choon Yee Lee

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Sore throat following tracheal intubation is a common postoperative complaint with a reported incidence of up to 90%. We performed a prospective randomised doubleblind clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of lignocaine 2% gel with waterbased lubricant (KY Jelly) in reducing post� intubation sore throat. Materials and Methods: One hundred and fifty one patients with American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation were enrolled into this study. Cuffed endotracheal tubes were lu� bricated with either lignocaine 2% (Group A) or a waterbased lubricant (Group B). Patients were as� sessed at three intervals (1, 12, and 24 h after surgery) by a blinded investigator for presence of sore throat, severity of sore throat and throat related complaints. Results: Significantly larger number of patients in Group A complained of throat dryness at 1 h ( p=0.035) and sore throat at 12 h ( p=0.001). Incidences of sore throat and throat related complaints were comparable at other time intervals. No differences in severity of sore throat were observed, and none of the patients required further treat� ment. Conclusion: Lignocaine 2% gel was not effective in reducing postintubation sore throat in com� parison with waterbased lubricant.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: Sore throat following tracheal intubation is a common postoperative complaint with a reported incidence of up to 90%. We performed a prospective randomised doubleblind clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of lignocaine 2% gel with waterbased lubricant (KY Jelly) in reducing post� intubation sore throat. Materials and Methods: One hundred and fifty one patients with American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation were enrolled into this study. Cuffed endotracheal tubes were lu� bricated with either lignocaine 2% (Group A) or a waterbased lubricant (Group B). Patients were as� sessed at three intervals (1, 12, and 24 h after surgery) by a blinded investigator for presence of sore throat, severity of sore throat and throat related complaints. Results: Significantly larger number of patients in Group A complained of throat dryness at 1 h ( p=0.035) and sore throat at 12 h ( p=0.001). Incidences of sore throat and throat related complaints were comparable at other time intervals. No differences in severity of sore throat were observed, and none of the patients required further treat� ment. Conclusion: Lignocaine 2% gel was not effective in reducing postintubation sore throat in com� parison with waterbased lubricant.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: Sore throat following tracheal intubation is a common postoperative complaint with a reported incidence of up to 90%. We performed a prospective randomised doubleblind clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of lignocaine 2% gel with waterbased lubricant (KY Jelly) in reducing post� intubation sore throat. Materials and Methods: One hundred and fifty one patients with American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation were enrolled into this study. Cuffed endotracheal tubes were lu� bricated with either lignocaine 2% (Group A) or a waterbased lubricant (Group B). Patients were as� sessed at three intervals (1, 12, and 24 h after surgery) by a blinded investigator for presence of sore throat, severity of sore throat and throat related complaints. Results: Significantly larger number of patients in Group A complained of throat dryness at 1 h ( p=0.035) and sore throat at 12 h ( p=0.001). Incidences of sore throat and throat related complaints were comparable at other time intervals. No differences in severity of sore throat were observed, and none of the patients required further treat� ment. Conclusion: Lignocaine 2% gel was not effective in reducing postintubation sore throat in com� parison with waterbased lubricant.

Key concepts: Sore throat, Medicine, Intubation, Anesthesia, Throat, Surgery, Pharyngitis, Tracheal intubation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between lignocaine 2% gel and water-based lubricant in reducing post intubation sore throat — Research Paper | ScholarLens