2016Ecological EntomologyRequires access

Parasitoid aggregation and interference in host–parasitoid dynamics

Toshinori Okuyama

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

1. Parasitoids do not distribute themselves evenly among available patches, which has an important bearing on the dynamics of host–parasitoid interactions. This study examined the density‐dependent nature of aggregation of the parasitoid D irhinus giffardii S ilvestri on the oriental fruit fly host, B actrocera dorsalis ( H endel) distributed among discrete patches. 2. Four artificial patches were created in a cage, and the number of hosts in each patch was manipulated. Parasitoids were released into the cage, and whether parasitoid density and host density influence the degree of parasitoid aggregation was examined. 3. Parasitoid aggregation became stronger (e.g. uneven distribution among patches) as the parasitoid density decreased and also as the host density increased. The index of parasitoid aggregation was not influenced by the distribution of hosts among patches. 4. The empirically characterised aggregation pattern was incorporated in a host–parasitoid model that consists of one host and one parasitoid species. The analysis of the model shows that an unstable system (i.e. the coexistence of the host and parasitoid is impossible) can be stabilised (i.e. coexistence is possible) when the parasitoid aggregates in a way that is consistent with the pattern found in the experiment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

1. Parasitoids do not distribute themselves evenly among available patches, which has an important bearing on the dynamics of host–parasitoid interactions. This study examined the density‐dependent nature of aggregation of the parasitoid D irhinus giffardii S ilvestri on the oriental fruit fly host, B actrocera dorsalis ( H endel) distributed among discrete patches. 2. Four artificial patches were created in a cage, and the number of hosts in each patch was manipulated. Parasitoids were released into the cage, and whether parasitoid density and host density influence the degree of parasitoid aggregation was examined. 3. Parasitoid aggregation became stronger (e.g. uneven distribution among patches) as the parasitoid density decreased and also as the host density increased. The index of parasitoid aggregation was not influenced by the distribution of hosts among patches. 4. The empirically characterised aggregation pattern was incorporated in a host–parasitoid model that consists of one host and one parasitoid species. The analysis of the model shows that an unstable system (i.e. the coexistence of the host and parasitoid is impossible) can be stabilised (i.e. coexistence is possible) when the parasitoid aggregates in a way that is consistent with the pattern found in the experiment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

1. Parasitoids do not distribute themselves evenly among available patches, which has an important bearing on the dynamics of host–parasitoid interactions. This study examined the density‐dependent nature of aggregation of the parasitoid D irhinus giffardii S ilvestri on the oriental fruit fly host, B actrocera dorsalis ( H endel) distributed among discrete patches. 2. Four artificial patches were created in a cage, and the number of hosts in each patch was manipulated. Parasitoids were released into the cage, and whether parasitoid density and host density influence the degree of parasitoid aggregation was examined. 3. Parasitoid aggregation became stronger (e.g. uneven distribution among patches) as the parasitoid density decreased and also as the host density increased. The index of parasitoid aggregation was not influenced by the distribution of hosts among patches. 4. The empirically characterised aggregation pattern was incorporated in a host–parasitoid model that consists of one host and one parasitoid species. The analysis of the model shows that an unstable system (i.e. the coexistence of the host and parasitoid is impossible) can be stabilised (i.e. coexistence is possible) when the parasitoid aggregates in a way that is consistent with the pattern found in the experiment.

Key concepts: Parasitoid, Biology, Host (biology), Ecology, Parasitism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Parasitoid aggregation and interference in host–parasitoid dynamics — Research Paper | ScholarLens