Genetic Influences on Response to Mood Stabilizers in Bipolar
Janusz Rybakowski
Abstract
Janusz Rybakowski
Abstract
Mood stabilizers form a cornerstone in the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder. The first repre- sentative of their family was lithium, still considered a prototype drug for the prevention of manic and depressive recurrences in bipolar disorder. Along with carbamazepine and valproates, lithium belongs to the first generation of mood stabilizers, which appeared in psychiatric treatment in the 1960s. Atypical antipsychotics with mood-stabilizing properties and lamotrigine, which were introduced in the mid-1990s, form the second generation of such drugs. The response of patients with bipolar disorder to mood stabi- lizers has different levels of magnitude. About one-third of lithium-treated patients are excellent responders, showing total prevention of the episodes, and these patients are clinically characterized by an episodic clinical course, complete remission, a bipolar family history, low psychi- atric co-morbidity and a hyperthymic temperament. It has been suggested that responders to carbamazepine or lam- otrigine may differ clinically from responders to lithium. The main phenotype of the response to mood stabilizers is a degree of prevention against recurrences of manic and depressive episodes during long-term treatment. The most specific scale in this respect is the so-called Alda scale, where retrospective assessment of lithium response is scored on a 0-10 scale. The vast majority of data on genetic influences on the response to mood stabilizers has been gathered in relation to lithium. The studies on the mechanisms of action of lithium and on the neurobiology of bipolar disorder have led to the identification of a number of candidate genes. The genes studied for their association with lithium response have been those con- nected with neurotransmitters (serotonin, dopamine and glutamate), second messengers (phosphatidyl inositol (PI), cyclic adenosine-monophosphate (cAMP) and protein kinase C (PKC) pathways), substances involved in neuro- protection (brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glycogen synthase kinase 3-b (GSK-3b)) and a number of other miscellaneous genes. There are no published phar- macogenomic studies of mood stabilizers other than lithium, except for one study of the X-box binding protein 1( XBP1) gene in relation to the efficacy of valproate. In recent years, a number of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in bipolar disorders have been performed and some of those have also focused on lithium response. They suggest roles for the glutamatergic receptor AMPA
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Mood stabilizers form a cornerstone in the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder. The first repre- sentative of their family was lithium, still considered a prototype drug for the prevention of manic and depressive recurrences in bipolar disorder. Along with carbamazepine and valproates, lithium belongs to the first generation of mood stabilizers, which appeared in psychiatric treatment in the 1960s. Atypical antipsychotics with mood-stabilizing properties and lamotrigine, which were introduced in the mid-1990s, form the second generation of such drugs. The response of patients with bipolar disorder to mood stabi- lizers has different levels of magnitude. About one-third of lithium-treated patients are excellent responders, showing total prevention of the episodes, and these patients are clinically characterized by an episodic clinical course, complete remission, a bipolar family history, low psychi- atric co-morbidity and a hyperthymic temperament. It has been suggested that responders to carbamazepine or lam- otrigine may differ clinically from responders to lithium. The main phenotype of the response to mood stabilizers is a degree of prevention against recurrences of manic and depressive episodes during long-term treatment. The most specific scale in this respect is the so-called Alda scale, where retrospective assessment of lithium response is scored on a 0-10 scale. The vast majority of data on genetic influences on the response to mood stabilizers has been gathered in relation to lithium. The studies on the mechanisms of action of lithium and on the neurobiology of bipolar disorder have led to the identification of a number of candidate genes. The genes studied for their association with lithium response have been those con- nected with neurotransmitters (serotonin, dopamine and glutamate), second messengers (phosphatidyl inositol (PI), cyclic adenosine-monophosphate (cAMP) and protein kinase C (PKC) pathways), substances involved in neuro- protection (brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glycogen synthase kinase 3-b (GSK-3b)) and a number of other miscellaneous genes. There are no published phar- macogenomic studies of mood stabilizers other than lithium, except for one study of the X-box binding protein 1( XBP1) gene in relation to the efficacy of valproate. In recent years, a number of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in bipolar disorders have been performed and some of those have also focused on lithium response. They suggest roles for the glutamatergic receptor AMPA
Key concepts: Bipolar disorder, Lamotrigine, Mood, Carbamazepine, Lithium (medication), Mood stabilizer, Psychology, Psychiatry