1939•The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)Open access

Evidence -- Presumption Against Suicide -- Nature and Effect on Burden of Proof

Roger H. Smith

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

promotion of justice would be greatly aided thereby.Actually a statute designed to approximate this result was proposed in New York in 1935," s but was not accepted.Later a modified form of the proposal was enacted which allows for impeachment by prior inconsistent statements provided they be in writing and sworn to.39 Commenting on the proposal, Professor Ladd suggested that it would be simpler to solve the entire problem by enacting a statute reading: "No party shall be precluded from impeaching a witness because the witness is his own." 4 In view of the statutes which have been enacted and the exceptions recognized in some States, there can be little doubt that the trend in the development of the law today is towards a modification of the rule, particularly with respect to prior inconsistent statements.It may be that the courts can find some justification for retaining the rule with respect to the other modes of impeachment, but it would be helpful if they would review its foundations in the light of present day circumstances.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

promotion of justice would be greatly aided thereby.Actually a statute designed to approximate this result was proposed in New York in 1935," s but was not accepted.Later a modified form of the proposal was enacted which allows for impeachment by prior inconsistent statements provided they be in writing and sworn to.39 Commenting on the proposal, Professor Ladd suggested that it would be simpler to solve the entire problem by enacting a statute reading: "No party shall be precluded from impeaching a witness because the witness is his own." 4 In view of the statutes which have been enacted and the exceptions recognized in some States, there can be little doubt that the trend in the development of the law today is towards a modification of the rule, particularly with respect to prior inconsistent statements.It may be that the courts can find some justification for retaining the rule with respect to the other modes of impeachment, but it would be helpful if they would review its foundations in the light of present day circumstances.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

promotion of justice would be greatly aided thereby.Actually a statute designed to approximate this result was proposed in New York in 1935," s but was not accepted.Later a modified form of the proposal was enacted which allows for impeachment by prior inconsistent statements provided they be in writing and sworn to.39 Commenting on the proposal, Professor Ladd suggested that it would be simpler to solve the entire problem by enacting a statute reading: "No party shall be precluded from impeaching a witness because the witness is his own." 4 In view of the statutes which have been enacted and the exceptions recognized in some States, there can be little doubt that the trend in the development of the law today is towards a modification of the rule, particularly with respect to prior inconsistent statements.It may be that the courts can find some justification for retaining the rule with respect to the other modes of impeachment, but it would be helpful if they would review its foundations in the light of present day circumstances.

Key concepts: Burden of proof, Presumption, Actuarial science, Psychology, Economics, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evidence -- Presumption Against Suicide -- Nature and Effect on Burden of Proof — Research Paper | ScholarLens