1982Journal of Special Education TechnologyRequires access

An Analysis of the Rise and Fall of Programmed Instruction. Implications for Computer-Assisted Instruction

Carol D. Foster

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

As computer use in education develops, the comparison of Computer-Assisted Instruction with programmed instruction and teaching machines becomes apparent. Although programmed instruction and teaching machines were expected to revolutionize education they rapidly fell into disuse. This paper discusses the similarities between them and Computer-Assisted Instruction, which has inherited many of the same expectations. It describes the attitudes toward and the research concerning programmed instruction, describes the increased flexibility that computers add to the teaching machines of the sixties, and makes recommendations for research that would permit computers to be integrated into the educational structure with more of an empirical base, with more systematic planning, and with an emphasis on producing learning environments that are both effective and interesting for the learner.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As computer use in education develops, the comparison of Computer-Assisted Instruction with programmed instruction and teaching machines becomes apparent. Although programmed instruction and teaching machines were expected to revolutionize education they rapidly fell into disuse. This paper discusses the similarities between them and Computer-Assisted Instruction, which has inherited many of the same expectations. It describes the attitudes toward and the research concerning programmed instruction, describes the increased flexibility that computers add to the teaching machines of the sixties, and makes recommendations for research that would permit computers to be integrated into the educational structure with more of an empirical base, with more systematic planning, and with an emphasis on producing learning environments that are both effective and interesting for the learner.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As computer use in education develops, the comparison of Computer-Assisted Instruction with programmed instruction and teaching machines becomes apparent. Although programmed instruction and teaching machines were expected to revolutionize education they rapidly fell into disuse. This paper discusses the similarities between them and Computer-Assisted Instruction, which has inherited many of the same expectations. It describes the attitudes toward and the research concerning programmed instruction, describes the increased flexibility that computers add to the teaching machines of the sixties, and makes recommendations for research that would permit computers to be integrated into the educational structure with more of an empirical base, with more systematic planning, and with an emphasis on producing learning environments that are both effective and interesting for the learner.

Key concepts: Programmed instruction, Flexibility (engineering), Computer science, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Mathematics education, Teaching method, Multimedia, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Analysis of the Rise and Fall of Programmed Instruction. Implications for Computer-Assisted Instruction — Research Paper | ScholarLens