2013•The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)Open access

Effects of Redistricting Methods on Election Outcomes and Congressional Polarization, 2002-2010

Phillip Burgoyne-Allen

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Every decade the United States conducts a census of the population, which is used to allocate congressional seats amongst the states. To reflect this change, states also redraw their voting districts. They do this in three major ways: through their state legislatures, through an independent commission, or through a hybrid system. This paper contends that these different means of redrawing states' districts have differing effects on the outcomes of congressional elections, as well as on the level of polarization in Congress. Specifically, this paper examines election data for the House of Representatives from each state during the years 2002 to 2010, as well as calculated scores of polarization for each elected candidate. Using this data, this paper analyzes the relative impact of each redistricting method and how it accounts for the current level of polarization in the House of Representatives. Lastly, this paper will use these findings to make policy recommendations for the future.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Every decade the United States conducts a census of the population, which is used to allocate congressional seats amongst the states. To reflect this change, states also redraw their voting districts. They do this in three major ways: through their state legislatures, through an independent commission, or through a hybrid system. This paper contends that these different means of redrawing states' districts have differing effects on the outcomes of congressional elections, as well as on the level of polarization in Congress. Specifically, this paper examines election data for the House of Representatives from each state during the years 2002 to 2010, as well as calculated scores of polarization for each elected candidate. Using this data, this paper analyzes the relative impact of each redistricting method and how it accounts for the current level of polarization in the House of Representatives. Lastly, this paper will use these findings to make policy recommendations for the future.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Every decade the United States conducts a census of the population, which is used to allocate congressional seats amongst the states. To reflect this change, states also redraw their voting districts. They do this in three major ways: through their state legislatures, through an independent commission, or through a hybrid system. This paper contends that these different means of redrawing states' districts have differing effects on the outcomes of congressional elections, as well as on the level of polarization in Congress. Specifically, this paper examines election data for the House of Representatives from each state during the years 2002 to 2010, as well as calculated scores of polarization for each elected candidate. Using this data, this paper analyzes the relative impact of each redistricting method and how it accounts for the current level of polarization in the House of Representatives. Lastly, this paper will use these findings to make policy recommendations for the future.

Key concepts: Redistricting, Political science, Polarization (electrochemistry), Public administration, Computer science, Law, Legislature, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of Redistricting Methods on Election Outcomes and Congressional Polarization, 2002-2010 — Research Paper | ScholarLens