2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Chickpea Grains Resistance to Pulse Beetle, Callosobruchus analis (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)

Muhammad Shafique, Maqbool Ahmad

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Grains of 22 chickpea genotypes were screened for resistance to pulse beetle, Callosobruchus analis (F.) under laboratory conditions (28±2°C and 60±5% R.H.). The results revealed that free choice oviposition by the beetle, adult progeny development, grain damage and weight loss' varied significantly (P< 0.05) among chickpea cultivars. Genotypes CM 3142-2/92, CM 88, CM 3142-3/92, CM72, and Pb91 harboured significantly lower number of eggs, adult progeny development, damage and grain weight loss indicating resistance to C. analis. The preference of the bruchid for host selection/oviposition seemed to be sensory to a larger extent as low number of eggs were laid on wrinkled and black grains genotypes. Various characteristics of chickpea for resistance to bruchids have been discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Grains of 22 chickpea genotypes were screened for resistance to pulse beetle, Callosobruchus analis (F.) under laboratory conditions (28±2°C and 60±5% R.H.). The results revealed that free choice oviposition by the beetle, adult progeny development, grain damage and weight loss' varied significantly (P< 0.05) among chickpea cultivars. Genotypes CM 3142-2/92, CM 88, CM 3142-3/92, CM72, and Pb91 harboured significantly lower number of eggs, adult progeny development, damage and grain weight loss indicating resistance to C. analis. The preference of the bruchid for host selection/oviposition seemed to be sensory to a larger extent as low number of eggs were laid on wrinkled and black grains genotypes. Various characteristics of chickpea for resistance to bruchids have been discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Grains of 22 chickpea genotypes were screened for resistance to pulse beetle, Callosobruchus analis (F.) under laboratory conditions (28±2°C and 60±5% R.H.). The results revealed that free choice oviposition by the beetle, adult progeny development, grain damage and weight loss' varied significantly (P< 0.05) among chickpea cultivars. Genotypes CM 3142-2/92, CM 88, CM 3142-3/92, CM72, and Pb91 harboured significantly lower number of eggs, adult progeny development, damage and grain weight loss indicating resistance to C. analis. The preference of the bruchid for host selection/oviposition seemed to be sensory to a larger extent as low number of eggs were laid on wrinkled and black grains genotypes. Various characteristics of chickpea for resistance to bruchids have been discussed.

Key concepts: Biology, Callosobruchus chinensis, Callosobruchus maculatus, Larva, Cultivar, Horticulture, Resistance (ecology), Host (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Chickpea Grains Resistance to Pulse Beetle, Callosobruchus analis (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) — Research Paper | ScholarLens