CONTROLLER TUNING FOR DISTURBANCE REJECTION ASSOCIATED WITH DELAYED DOUBLE INTEGRATING PROCESSES, PART II: I-PD CONTROLLER
Galal Ali Hassaan
Abstract
Open-access reader
Galal Ali Hassaan
Abstract
Open-access reader
An I-PD controller is investigated for disturbance rejection associated with delayed double integrating processes. The controller is tuned using the MATLAB optimization toolbox and five different error-based objective functions for process time delay between 0.1 and 5 s. The more suitable objective function for disturbance rejection with the I-PD controller used with the delayed double integrating process is assigned and the effect of the process time delay on the performance of the control system in the time domain is shown. The unit step disturbance input time response of the control system has a maximum value less than 0.431, time of maximum time response less than 1.01 s and a settling time less than 15 s for time delay ≤ 1 s. The simulation results using the I-PD controller are superior when compared with other disturbance rejection techniques based on using PD-PI and PIDF controllers.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
An I-PD controller is investigated for disturbance rejection associated with delayed double integrating processes. The controller is tuned using the MATLAB optimization toolbox and five different error-based objective functions for process time delay between 0.1 and 5 s. The more suitable objective function for disturbance rejection with the I-PD controller used with the delayed double integrating process is assigned and the effect of the process time delay on the performance of the control system in the time domain is shown. The unit step disturbance input time response of the control system has a maximum value less than 0.431, time of maximum time response less than 1.01 s and a settling time less than 15 s for time delay ≤ 1 s. The simulation results using the I-PD controller are superior when compared with other disturbance rejection techniques based on using PD-PI and PIDF controllers.
Key concepts: Control theory (sociology), Settling time, Disturbance (geology), Controller (irrigation), PID controller, MATLAB, Computer science, Process (computing)