2012•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

La Relación Como Categoría Esencial de la Obligación y de la Responsabilidad Contractual (The Violation of Relationship as Fundament of Contractual Liability)

Carlo Castronovo

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Obligation is a complex structure which, as culpa in contrahendo makes clear, can stay without the duty of performance. This has been accepted by the Italian Corte di Cassazione, being critized by some author. The argument against the idea of obligation without a primary duty of performance specially regards liability of medical doctors working in a hospital. They do not have any duty of performance as to the patients, since they are obliged to the hospital. It is hard, though, to place them with regard to patients at the general level of the alterum non laedere principle presiding extracontractual liability. Their professional position creates a reliance which reflects on liability. Consequently this one has contractual nature, precisely demonstrating that there can be obligation without a duty of performance. The implication is that relationship not performance constitutes the essence of obligation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Obligation is a complex structure which, as culpa in contrahendo makes clear, can stay without the duty of performance. This has been accepted by the Italian Corte di Cassazione, being critized by some author. The argument against the idea of obligation without a primary duty of performance specially regards liability of medical doctors working in a hospital. They do not have any duty of performance as to the patients, since they are obliged to the hospital. It is hard, though, to place them with regard to patients at the general level of the alterum non laedere principle presiding extracontractual liability. Their professional position creates a reliance which reflects on liability. Consequently this one has contractual nature, precisely demonstrating that there can be obligation without a duty of performance. The implication is that relationship not performance constitutes the essence of obligation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Obligation is a complex structure which, as culpa in contrahendo makes clear, can stay without the duty of performance. This has been accepted by the Italian Corte di Cassazione, being critized by some author. The argument against the idea of obligation without a primary duty of performance specially regards liability of medical doctors working in a hospital. They do not have any duty of performance as to the patients, since they are obliged to the hospital. It is hard, though, to place them with regard to patients at the general level of the alterum non laedere principle presiding extracontractual liability. Their professional position creates a reliance which reflects on liability. Consequently this one has contractual nature, precisely demonstrating that there can be obligation without a duty of performance. The implication is that relationship not performance constitutes the essence of obligation.

Key concepts: Obligation, Duty, Liability, Argument (complex analysis), Law, Position (finance), Business, Law and economics

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
La Relación Como Categoría Esencial de la Obligación y de la Responsabilidad Contractual (The Violation of Relationship as Fundament of Contractual Liability) — Research Paper | ScholarLens