U.S. v. Mehanna, the First Amendment, and Material Support in the War on Terror
Nikolas Abel
Abstract
Nikolas Abel
Abstract
This note examines the history of the right to free speech during wartime and the Material Support Statute in the War on Terror through the lens of the conviction of Tarek Mehanna. After examining the effect of the Material Support Statute on the right to free speech, this note will argue that a new incitement standard should be developed for speech which provides support for terrorism.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This note examines the history of the right to free speech during wartime and the Material Support Statute in the War on Terror through the lens of the conviction of Tarek Mehanna. After examining the effect of the Material Support Statute on the right to free speech, this note will argue that a new incitement standard should be developed for speech which provides support for terrorism.
Key concepts: Incitement, Statute, Conviction, Law, Terrorism, Political science, First amendment, Spanish Civil War