1988Unpublished venueRequires access

Army Aviation and Air Combat: Evolutionary or Revolutionary

Danny C. Cox, Richard N. Roy

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Examines form both a historical and doctrinal perspective the use of Army Aviation resource to fight in an air-to-air combat role. A description of the threat describes Soviet helicopter design initiatives and provides an insight as to how the Soviets envision employing helicopters in an air combat role. A historical review of Army Aviation's development details how aviation has been integrated into the Army's combined arms team dedicated to winning the ground war. The use of Army assets in counterair operations is mandated by joint doctrine and the Army is responsible for developing a capability to implement that doctrine. The Army's air defense doctrine incorporates the concept of combined arms and Army Aviation has the ability to contribute as a integral member of the combined arms team. This paper acknowledges that the Army's counterair mission is doctrinally legitimate; however, the suggestion is made that the use of Army aircraft in an air combat role is a revolutionary departure from the historical evolution of Army Aviation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Examines form both a historical and doctrinal perspective the use of Army Aviation resource to fight in an air-to-air combat role. A description of the threat describes Soviet helicopter design initiatives and provides an insight as to how the Soviets envision employing helicopters in an air combat role. A historical review of Army Aviation's development details how aviation has been integrated into the Army's combined arms team dedicated to winning the ground war. The use of Army assets in counterair operations is mandated by joint doctrine and the Army is responsible for developing a capability to implement that doctrine. The Army's air defense doctrine incorporates the concept of combined arms and Army Aviation has the ability to contribute as a integral member of the combined arms team. This paper acknowledges that the Army's counterair mission is doctrinally legitimate; however, the suggestion is made that the use of Army aircraft in an air combat role is a revolutionary departure from the historical evolution of Army Aviation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Examines form both a historical and doctrinal perspective the use of Army Aviation resource to fight in an air-to-air combat role. A description of the threat describes Soviet helicopter design initiatives and provides an insight as to how the Soviets envision employing helicopters in an air combat role. A historical review of Army Aviation's development details how aviation has been integrated into the Army's combined arms team dedicated to winning the ground war. The use of Army assets in counterair operations is mandated by joint doctrine and the Army is responsible for developing a capability to implement that doctrine. The Army's air defense doctrine incorporates the concept of combined arms and Army Aviation has the ability to contribute as a integral member of the combined arms team. This paper acknowledges that the Army's counterair mission is doctrinally legitimate; however, the suggestion is made that the use of Army aircraft in an air combat role is a revolutionary departure from the historical evolution of Army Aviation.

Key concepts: Aeronautics, Aviation, Aerospace engineering, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Army Aviation and Air Combat: Evolutionary or Revolutionary — Research Paper | ScholarLens