2015Australasian Road Safety Conference, 1st, 2015, Gold Coast, Queensland, AustraliaRequires access

Greater understanding of rear-end crashes in a safe system

David Beck

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Rear-end crashes contribute a significant proportion of the total fatal and serious injury (FSI) crashes occurring on Australian roads. Despite accounting for less than 2% of fatal crashes on Australian and New Zealand roads, this crash type accounts for an estimated 16% of serious injury crashes on urban roads and approximately 8% on rural roads. As such, road safety professionals seeking to drive down FSI crashes need to consider methods of addressing this crash type. As rear-end crashes are generally less severe than other crash types, it may be tempting to assume that these crashes do not warrant attention when addressing crashes resulting in fatal or serious injuries. Further, since it is not possible to physically separate or shield the striking vehicle from the struck vehicle, developing options to treat the rear-end crash problem may be considered to consume too many resources for too little benefit. This extended abstract describes the findings of an Austroads’ study to identify factors contributing to the incidence and severity of rear-end crashes and treatments to reduce their occurrence or mitigate their severity. The study involved a literature review, detailed analysis of 5 years of crash data from Australia and New Zealand, and a comparison of common factors at crash sites in several states. The extended abstract discusses options within the four Safe System pillars for addressing rear-end crashes in order to answer the question: Is it worthwhile investing our resources in treating this crash type?

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Rear-end crashes contribute a significant proportion of the total fatal and serious injury (FSI) crashes occurring on Australian roads. Despite accounting for less than 2% of fatal crashes on Australian and New Zealand roads, this crash type accounts for an estimated 16% of serious injury crashes on urban roads and approximately 8% on rural roads. As such, road safety professionals seeking to drive down FSI crashes need to consider methods of addressing this crash type. As rear-end crashes are generally less severe than other crash types, it may be tempting to assume that these crashes do not warrant attention when addressing crashes resulting in fatal or serious injuries. Further, since it is not possible to physically separate or shield the striking vehicle from the struck vehicle, developing options to treat the rear-end crash problem may be considered to consume too many resources for too little benefit. This extended abstract describes the findings of an Austroads’ study to identify factors contributing to the incidence and severity of rear-end crashes and treatments to reduce their occurrence or mitigate their severity. The study involved a literature review, detailed analysis of 5 years of crash data from Australia and New Zealand, and a comparison of common factors at crash sites in several states. The extended abstract discusses options within the four Safe System pillars for addressing rear-end crashes in order to answer the question: Is it worthwhile investing our resources in treating this crash type?

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Rear-end crashes contribute a significant proportion of the total fatal and serious injury (FSI) crashes occurring on Australian roads. Despite accounting for less than 2% of fatal crashes on Australian and New Zealand roads, this crash type accounts for an estimated 16% of serious injury crashes on urban roads and approximately 8% on rural roads. As such, road safety professionals seeking to drive down FSI crashes need to consider methods of addressing this crash type. As rear-end crashes are generally less severe than other crash types, it may be tempting to assume that these crashes do not warrant attention when addressing crashes resulting in fatal or serious injuries. Further, since it is not possible to physically separate or shield the striking vehicle from the struck vehicle, developing options to treat the rear-end crash problem may be considered to consume too many resources for too little benefit. This extended abstract describes the findings of an Austroads’ study to identify factors contributing to the incidence and severity of rear-end crashes and treatments to reduce their occurrence or mitigate their severity. The study involved a literature review, detailed analysis of 5 years of crash data from Australia and New Zealand, and a comparison of common factors at crash sites in several states. The extended abstract discusses options within the four Safe System pillars for addressing rear-end crashes in order to answer the question: Is it worthwhile investing our resources in treating this crash type?

Key concepts: Crash, Transport engineering, Engineering, Business, Forensic engineering, Computer science, Programming language

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Greater understanding of rear-end crashes in a safe system — Research Paper | ScholarLens