2009•Unpublished venueRequires access

Non-Invasive Methods of Peripheral Pulse Detection: Advantages and Disadvantages

Bistra Nenova, Ivo Tsvetanov Iliev

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

In a series of resuscitation guidelines produced by authoritative international organizations is emphasized that checking the carotid pulse is an inaccurate method of confirming the presence or absence of circulation. A summary review of the most popular non-invasive methods of peripheral pulse detection is presented in this work - Photo- plethysmography, Impedance Plethysmography, Doppler Ultrasound, Arterial Tonometry and Oscillometric method. A comparative analysis of the methods highlights their advantages and disadvantages in view of applicability in emergency situations. Photoplethysmography and Impedance Plethysmography are estimated as having very good and good applicability. The usage of Doppler Ultrasound method for peripheral pulse detection is possible, but is associated with technological difficulties and high cost. In the rest of the methods substantial disadvantages stand out. Keywords - Peripheral pulse detection, Non-invasive methods, Emergency

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In a series of resuscitation guidelines produced by authoritative international organizations is emphasized that checking the carotid pulse is an inaccurate method of confirming the presence or absence of circulation. A summary review of the most popular non-invasive methods of peripheral pulse detection is presented in this work - Photo- plethysmography, Impedance Plethysmography, Doppler Ultrasound, Arterial Tonometry and Oscillometric method. A comparative analysis of the methods highlights their advantages and disadvantages in view of applicability in emergency situations. Photoplethysmography and Impedance Plethysmography are estimated as having very good and good applicability. The usage of Doppler Ultrasound method for peripheral pulse detection is possible, but is associated with technological difficulties and high cost. In the rest of the methods substantial disadvantages stand out. Keywords - Peripheral pulse detection, Non-invasive methods, Emergency

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In a series of resuscitation guidelines produced by authoritative international organizations is emphasized that checking the carotid pulse is an inaccurate method of confirming the presence or absence of circulation. A summary review of the most popular non-invasive methods of peripheral pulse detection is presented in this work - Photo- plethysmography, Impedance Plethysmography, Doppler Ultrasound, Arterial Tonometry and Oscillometric method. A comparative analysis of the methods highlights their advantages and disadvantages in view of applicability in emergency situations. Photoplethysmography and Impedance Plethysmography are estimated as having very good and good applicability. The usage of Doppler Ultrasound method for peripheral pulse detection is possible, but is associated with technological difficulties and high cost. In the rest of the methods substantial disadvantages stand out. Keywords - Peripheral pulse detection, Non-invasive methods, Emergency

Key concepts: Photoplethysmogram, Plethysmograph, Peripheral, Pulse (music), Doppler ultrasound, Computer science, Ultrasound, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Non-Invasive Methods of Peripheral Pulse Detection: Advantages and Disadvantages — Research Paper | ScholarLens