1999PubMedRequires access

Use of a colonic pouch as a rectal substitute after rectal excision.

Teixeira Fv, Miguél Pera, Kelly Ka

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Mid or distal rectal resection with straight coloanal anastomosis effectively treats distal rectal cancer and avoids a permanent stoma. However, the straight colonic segment is a poor reservoir for stools, and patients usually experience varying degrees of impaired rectal function after operation, including frequent bowel movements, incontinence, tenesmus, and soiling. In contrast, a J-shaped colonic pouch provides an adequate neorectal reservoir after operation. Patients with a colonic pouch-anal canal anastomosis have fewer bowel movements per day than patients with straight colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. Furthermore, the morbidity of the colonic pouch is not greater than that of the straight coloanal anastomosis. An important technical aspect of the colonic pouch procedure is that the limbs used to form the pouch must be no longer than 5 to 6 cm. Patients with larger pouches experience emptying difficulties. Also, the level of the anastomosis between the pouch and the anal canal must be no more than 4 cm from the anal verge, again to avoid problems with defecation. With these caveats, the operation should be considered in patients who require excision of the mid and distal rectum for cancer.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Mid or distal rectal resection with straight coloanal anastomosis effectively treats distal rectal cancer and avoids a permanent stoma. However, the straight colonic segment is a poor reservoir for stools, and patients usually experience varying degrees of impaired rectal function after operation, including frequent bowel movements, incontinence, tenesmus, and soiling. In contrast, a J-shaped colonic pouch provides an adequate neorectal reservoir after operation. Patients with a colonic pouch-anal canal anastomosis have fewer bowel movements per day than patients with straight colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. Furthermore, the morbidity of the colonic pouch is not greater than that of the straight coloanal anastomosis. An important technical aspect of the colonic pouch procedure is that the limbs used to form the pouch must be no longer than 5 to 6 cm. Patients with larger pouches experience emptying difficulties. Also, the level of the anastomosis between the pouch and the anal canal must be no more than 4 cm from the anal verge, again to avoid problems with defecation. With these caveats, the operation should be considered in patients who require excision of the mid and distal rectum for cancer.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Mid or distal rectal resection with straight coloanal anastomosis effectively treats distal rectal cancer and avoids a permanent stoma. However, the straight colonic segment is a poor reservoir for stools, and patients usually experience varying degrees of impaired rectal function after operation, including frequent bowel movements, incontinence, tenesmus, and soiling. In contrast, a J-shaped colonic pouch provides an adequate neorectal reservoir after operation. Patients with a colonic pouch-anal canal anastomosis have fewer bowel movements per day than patients with straight colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. Furthermore, the morbidity of the colonic pouch is not greater than that of the straight coloanal anastomosis. An important technical aspect of the colonic pouch procedure is that the limbs used to form the pouch must be no longer than 5 to 6 cm. Patients with larger pouches experience emptying difficulties. Also, the level of the anastomosis between the pouch and the anal canal must be no more than 4 cm from the anal verge, again to avoid problems with defecation. With these caveats, the operation should be considered in patients who require excision of the mid and distal rectum for cancer.

Key concepts: Coloanal anastomosis, Medicine, Pouch, Anastomosis, Defecation, Rectum, Anal verge, Stoma (medicine)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Use of a colonic pouch as a rectal substitute after rectal excision. — Research Paper | ScholarLens