2009Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Open access

Development of the Mouse Notochord

Owen J. Tamplin

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

During development of the vertebrate embryo, a highly conserved tissue called the organizer forms during gastrulation, and is required for establishment of the basic body plan. In mouse, the organizer gives rise to the node and notochord, which are both transient signaling centres involved in patterning the body axes. The genetic regulation and morphogenesis of these tissues, particularly in the mouse, is not well understood. To follow the formation of these tissues we used time-lapse live imaging together with conventional cell lineage tracking. This showed that the notochord has distinct morphogenetic origins along the anterior-posterior axis: anterior head process forms by condensation of dispersed midline organizer cells; trunk forms by convergent extension of node cells; tail forms from posteriorly migrating node cells—this challenges the previously accepted model that tail notochord forms by node regression. We have also found there are distinct genetic requirements within these different regions. Previous mouse mutant analysis showed that conserved transcription factors Foxa2 and Noto are required for either all notochord regions or just tail notochord, respectively. We found a novel genetic interaction between the two demonstrated Foxa2 compensates for Noto specifically in the trunk notochord. Furthermore, we found Noto has a conserved role in regulating axial (notochord) versus paraxial (somite) cell fate. Therefore, we proposed there are three distinct regions within the mouse notochord, each with its own unique morphogenetic origins and genetic control. We have also conducted two microarray-based screens to identify novel gene expression patterns in the node and notochord. First, we compared Foxa2 mutant and wild type gastrula embryos. Second, we isolated notochord progenitors from early somite stage embryos. Extensive in situ hybridization screening based on both data sets revealed over 50 node and notochord expression patterns. Lastly, we screened Foxa2-bound chromatin regions near these notochord-specific genes using a transient zebrafish expression assay, and identified two novel notochord cis-regulatory modules. Together, we found a combination of classical genetics, embryology, and novel imaging techniques, has given us a better understanding of the morphogenesis and genetic regulation of pattern formation in the developing mouse embryo.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

During development of the vertebrate embryo, a highly conserved tissue called the organizer forms during gastrulation, and is required for establishment of the basic body plan. In mouse, the organizer gives rise to the node and notochord, which are both transient signaling centres involved in patterning the body axes. The genetic regulation and morphogenesis of these tissues, particularly in the mouse, is not well understood. To follow the formation of these tissues we used time-lapse live imaging together with conventional cell lineage tracking. This showed that the notochord has distinct morphogenetic origins along the anterior-posterior axis: anterior head process forms by condensation of dispersed midline organizer cells; trunk forms by convergent extension of node cells; tail forms from posteriorly migrating node cells—this challenges the previously accepted model that tail notochord forms by node regression. We have also found there are distinct genetic requirements within these different regions. Previous mouse mutant analysis showed that conserved transcription factors Foxa2 and Noto are required for either all notochord regions or just tail notochord, respectively. We found a novel genetic interaction between the two demonstrated Foxa2 compensates for Noto specifically in the trunk notochord. Furthermore, we found Noto has a conserved role in regulating axial (notochord) versus paraxial (somite) cell fate. Therefore, we proposed there are three distinct regions within the mouse notochord, each with its own unique morphogenetic origins and genetic control. We have also conducted two microarray-based screens to identify novel gene expression patterns in the node and notochord. First, we compared Foxa2 mutant and wild type gastrula embryos. Second, we isolated notochord progenitors from early somite stage embryos. Extensive in situ hybridization screening based on both data sets revealed over 50 node and notochord expression patterns. Lastly, we screened Foxa2-bound chromatin regions near these notochord-specific genes using a transient zebrafish expression assay, and identified two novel notochord cis-regulatory modules. Together, we found a combination of classical genetics, embryology, and novel imaging techniques, has given us a better understanding of the morphogenesis and genetic regulation of pattern formation in the developing mouse embryo.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

During development of the vertebrate embryo, a highly conserved tissue called the organizer forms during gastrulation, and is required for establishment of the basic body plan. In mouse, the organizer gives rise to the node and notochord, which are both transient signaling centres involved in patterning the body axes. The genetic regulation and morphogenesis of these tissues, particularly in the mouse, is not well understood. To follow the formation of these tissues we used time-lapse live imaging together with conventional cell lineage tracking. This showed that the notochord has distinct morphogenetic origins along the anterior-posterior axis: anterior head process forms by condensation of dispersed midline organizer cells; trunk forms by convergent extension of node cells; tail forms from posteriorly migrating node cells—this challenges the previously accepted model that tail notochord forms by node regression. We have also found there are distinct genetic requirements within these different regions. Previous mouse mutant analysis showed that conserved transcription factors Foxa2 and Noto are required for either all notochord regions or just tail notochord, respectively. We found a novel genetic interaction between the two demonstrated Foxa2 compensates for Noto specifically in the trunk notochord. Furthermore, we found Noto has a conserved role in regulating axial (notochord) versus paraxial (somite) cell fate. Therefore, we proposed there are three distinct regions within the mouse notochord, each with its own unique morphogenetic origins and genetic control. We have also conducted two microarray-based screens to identify novel gene expression patterns in the node and notochord. First, we compared Foxa2 mutant and wild type gastrula embryos. Second, we isolated notochord progenitors from early somite stage embryos. Extensive in situ hybridization screening based on both data sets revealed over 50 node and notochord expression patterns. Lastly, we screened Foxa2-bound chromatin regions near these notochord-specific genes using a transient zebrafish expression assay, and identified two novel notochord cis-regulatory modules. Together, we found a combination of classical genetics, embryology, and novel imaging techniques, has given us a better understanding of the morphogenesis and genetic regulation of pattern formation in the developing mouse embryo.

Key concepts: Notochord, Biology, Computational biology, Cell biology, Embryogenesis, Embryo

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Development of the Mouse Notochord — Research Paper | ScholarLens