2015Unpublished venueOpen access

Chloride ingress testing of concrete

D. Dunne, Christian Christodoulou, Moray D. Newlands, Philip McKenna, Chris I. Goodier

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Concrete is recognised as a durable material that can provide long-term protection to embedded carbon steel reinforcement. However, effective protection can only be achieved if the mechanisms of deterioration and the durability properties of the protective material involved are fully understood. A well-known phenomenon is the ingress of chloride ions into concrete, which takes place via the solution-filled pores. These ions, combined with optimum contents of air and moisture, result in reinforcement corrosion, and subsequently, loss in functionality of a reinforced concrete element. Currently, available literature suggests that measurement of chloride ion ingress into concrete can be misleading. Reasons for erroneous measurements include: (i) continuing formation of hydration products resulting in pore refinement/pore blocking and; (ii) chloride diffusion coefficients being commonly applied as the “effective” diffusivity, which does not take into account the effect of chemical binding on the chloride ion transport process. This paper reports the findings of an investigation of different chloride test methods for measuring chloride ingress of concrete, which are currently used. This was undertaken to establish their suitability to measure this intrinsic concrete durability property. Five test methods were selected, covering the two main test method types that currently finding application: (i) electrically accelerated short-term; and (ii) naturally accelerated long-term chloride test methods. Three concrete types of CEM I, PC/FA (20–55%) and PC/GGBS (25–75%) at varying water-cement (w/c) ratios of 0.35, 0.50 and 0.65 were utilised during the investigation. This work has established that whilst all the test methods demonstrated capacities to measure chloride ingress into concrete, operator accuracy is of significant importance.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Concrete is recognised as a durable material that can provide long-term protection to embedded carbon steel reinforcement. However, effective protection can only be achieved if the mechanisms of deterioration and the durability properties of the protective material involved are fully understood. A well-known phenomenon is the ingress of chloride ions into concrete, which takes place via the solution-filled pores. These ions, combined with optimum contents of air and moisture, result in reinforcement corrosion, and subsequently, loss in functionality of a reinforced concrete element. Currently, available literature suggests that measurement of chloride ion ingress into concrete can be misleading. Reasons for erroneous measurements include: (i) continuing formation of hydration products resulting in pore refinement/pore blocking and; (ii) chloride diffusion coefficients being commonly applied as the “effective” diffusivity, which does not take into account the effect of chemical binding on the chloride ion transport process. This paper reports the findings of an investigation of different chloride test methods for measuring chloride ingress of concrete, which are currently used. This was undertaken to establish their suitability to measure this intrinsic concrete durability property. Five test methods were selected, covering the two main test method types that currently finding application: (i) electrically accelerated short-term; and (ii) naturally accelerated long-term chloride test methods. Three concrete types of CEM I, PC/FA (20–55%) and PC/GGBS (25–75%) at varying water-cement (w/c) ratios of 0.35, 0.50 and 0.65 were utilised during the investigation. This work has established that whilst all the test methods demonstrated capacities to measure chloride ingress into concrete, operator accuracy is of significant importance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Concrete is recognised as a durable material that can provide long-term protection to embedded carbon steel reinforcement. However, effective protection can only be achieved if the mechanisms of deterioration and the durability properties of the protective material involved are fully understood. A well-known phenomenon is the ingress of chloride ions into concrete, which takes place via the solution-filled pores. These ions, combined with optimum contents of air and moisture, result in reinforcement corrosion, and subsequently, loss in functionality of a reinforced concrete element. Currently, available literature suggests that measurement of chloride ion ingress into concrete can be misleading. Reasons for erroneous measurements include: (i) continuing formation of hydration products resulting in pore refinement/pore blocking and; (ii) chloride diffusion coefficients being commonly applied as the “effective” diffusivity, which does not take into account the effect of chemical binding on the chloride ion transport process. This paper reports the findings of an investigation of different chloride test methods for measuring chloride ingress of concrete, which are currently used. This was undertaken to establish their suitability to measure this intrinsic concrete durability property. Five test methods were selected, covering the two main test method types that currently finding application: (i) electrically accelerated short-term; and (ii) naturally accelerated long-term chloride test methods. Three concrete types of CEM I, PC/FA (20–55%) and PC/GGBS (25–75%) at varying water-cement (w/c) ratios of 0.35, 0.50 and 0.65 were utilised during the investigation. This work has established that whilst all the test methods demonstrated capacities to measure chloride ingress into concrete, operator accuracy is of significant importance.

Key concepts: Forensic engineering, Materials science, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Chloride ingress testing of concrete — Research Paper | ScholarLens