2007NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia)Requires access

Public Private Partnerships: The Provision of Social Infrastructure in Australia

Marcus Jefferies, William McGeorge, Kathryn Cadman, Swee-Eng Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Recent trends in the provision of infrastructure indicate that the private sector is playing an increasingly important role in the procurement process. Australian governments are turning to the private sector to form partnerships in the finance, construction, ownership and operation of social infrastructure projects. This has become a major challenge and the emergence of Public-Private Sector Partnerships (PPPs) provides a means for developing the infrastructure without directly impacting upon the governments budgetary constraints. Social infrastructure projects (school, hospitals, prison etc) are characterised as generally being smaller in scale than economic infrastructure (motorways, bridges, tunnels etc.)However, by their very nature, social infrastructure PPPs are often presented with a situation where operational involvement with the community. Thus private sector bidders for social infrastructure PPS are as attractive for social infrastructure compared with economic infrastructure. The paper discusses the additional costs likely to be incurred in the bidding process for social infrastructure PPPs. The results are presented from a Private Sector point of view.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recent trends in the provision of infrastructure indicate that the private sector is playing an increasingly important role in the procurement process. Australian governments are turning to the private sector to form partnerships in the finance, construction, ownership and operation of social infrastructure projects. This has become a major challenge and the emergence of Public-Private Sector Partnerships (PPPs) provides a means for developing the infrastructure without directly impacting upon the governments budgetary constraints. Social infrastructure projects (school, hospitals, prison etc) are characterised as generally being smaller in scale than economic infrastructure (motorways, bridges, tunnels etc.)However, by their very nature, social infrastructure PPPs are often presented with a situation where operational involvement with the community. Thus private sector bidders for social infrastructure PPS are as attractive for social infrastructure compared with economic infrastructure. The paper discusses the additional costs likely to be incurred in the bidding process for social infrastructure PPPs. The results are presented from a Private Sector point of view.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recent trends in the provision of infrastructure indicate that the private sector is playing an increasingly important role in the procurement process. Australian governments are turning to the private sector to form partnerships in the finance, construction, ownership and operation of social infrastructure projects. This has become a major challenge and the emergence of Public-Private Sector Partnerships (PPPs) provides a means for developing the infrastructure without directly impacting upon the governments budgetary constraints. Social infrastructure projects (school, hospitals, prison etc) are characterised as generally being smaller in scale than economic infrastructure (motorways, bridges, tunnels etc.)However, by their very nature, social infrastructure PPPs are often presented with a situation where operational involvement with the community. Thus private sector bidders for social infrastructure PPS are as attractive for social infrastructure compared with economic infrastructure. The paper discusses the additional costs likely to be incurred in the bidding process for social infrastructure PPPs. The results are presented from a Private Sector point of view.

Key concepts: Private sector, Procurement, Public infrastructure, Business, Government (linguistics), Bidding, Finance, Critical infrastructure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Public Private Partnerships: The Provision of Social Infrastructure in Australia — Research Paper | ScholarLens