2017Unpublished venueRequires access

The Right to Autonomy in Religious Affairs: A Comparative View

Durham W. Cole

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Protection of the right of religious communities to autonomy in structuring their religious affairs lies at the very core of protecting religious freedom. One of the fundamental questions a comparative study of religious autonomy faces is whether there is a "common core" of religious activity that has been identified across cultures as deserving attention. This chapter describes three approaches to protection of religious autonomy that have emerged in United States case law: what might be called a free exercise approach, an establishment approach, and an "internal disputes" approach. The right of religious organizations to autonomy in their own affairs is one of the critical features of any regime of religious freedom. The justification for religious autonomy rights extends beyond recognizing the religious rights have a collective dimension that can be protected only through protection of autonomy rights.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Protection of the right of religious communities to autonomy in structuring their religious affairs lies at the very core of protecting religious freedom. One of the fundamental questions a comparative study of religious autonomy faces is whether there is a "common core" of religious activity that has been identified across cultures as deserving attention. This chapter describes three approaches to protection of religious autonomy that have emerged in United States case law: what might be called a free exercise approach, an establishment approach, and an "internal disputes" approach. The right of religious organizations to autonomy in their own affairs is one of the critical features of any regime of religious freedom. The justification for religious autonomy rights extends beyond recognizing the religious rights have a collective dimension that can be protected only through protection of autonomy rights.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Protection of the right of religious communities to autonomy in structuring their religious affairs lies at the very core of protecting religious freedom. One of the fundamental questions a comparative study of religious autonomy faces is whether there is a "common core" of religious activity that has been identified across cultures as deserving attention. This chapter describes three approaches to protection of religious autonomy that have emerged in United States case law: what might be called a free exercise approach, an establishment approach, and an "internal disputes" approach. The right of religious organizations to autonomy in their own affairs is one of the critical features of any regime of religious freedom. The justification for religious autonomy rights extends beyond recognizing the religious rights have a collective dimension that can be protected only through protection of autonomy rights.

Key concepts: Autonomy, Political science, Sociology, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Right to Autonomy in Religious Affairs: A Comparative View — Research Paper | ScholarLens