Renal Perfusion Image Using Harmonic Ultrasound with Microbble Contrast Agent: Preliminary Study
Jung Hoon Kim, Hyo Won Eun, Hun Jae Lee, Jae Ho Choi, Dong Han, Hi Bahl Lee, Deuk Lin Choi
Abstract
Jung Hoon Kim, Hyo Won Eun, Hun Jae Lee, Jae Ho Choi, Dong Han, Hi Bahl Lee, Deuk Lin Choi
Abstract
Purpose: To compare, in terms of their feasibility and normal range, Tc-DTPA renal perfusion imaging and renal perfusion imaging using harmonic ultrasound (US)with a microbubble contrast agent for the evaluation of renal perfusion after renal transplantation. Materials and Methods: During a six-month period, thirty patients who had received a renal transplant underwent both Tc-DTPA renal perfusion imaging and renal perfusion imaging using harmonic US with a microbubble contrast agent. Sonographic renal perfusion images were obtained before and after a bolus injection of the microbubble contrast agent Levovist (SH U 508A; Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) every 3 seconds for 3 minutes. Sonographic renal perfusion images were converted into a renal perfusion curve by a computer program and Tpeak of the curve thus obtained was compared with that of the Tc-DTPA curve. Results: Average T of the Tc-DTPA renal perfusion curve was 16.2 seconds in the normal group and 39.6 seconds in the delayed perfusion group, while average T of the sonographic renal perfusion curve was 23.7 seconds and 46.2 seconds, respectively. T of the sonographic renal perfusion curve showed a good correlation with that of the Tc-DTPA curve (correlation coefficient=0.8209; p=0.0001). The cut-off value of T of the sonographic renal perfusion curve was 35 seconds (sensitivity=90%, specificity=95%). Conclusion: In patients who have received a renal transplant, the findings of renal perfusion imaging using harmonic US with a microbubble contrast agent show close correlation with those of Tc-DTPA renal perfusion imaging. The optimal cut-off value of Tpeak of the sonographic renal perfusion curve was 35 seconds
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Purpose: To compare, in terms of their feasibility and normal range, Tc-DTPA renal perfusion imaging and renal perfusion imaging using harmonic ultrasound (US)with a microbubble contrast agent for the evaluation of renal perfusion after renal transplantation. Materials and Methods: During a six-month period, thirty patients who had received a renal transplant underwent both Tc-DTPA renal perfusion imaging and renal perfusion imaging using harmonic US with a microbubble contrast agent. Sonographic renal perfusion images were obtained before and after a bolus injection of the microbubble contrast agent Levovist (SH U 508A; Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) every 3 seconds for 3 minutes. Sonographic renal perfusion images were converted into a renal perfusion curve by a computer program and Tpeak of the curve thus obtained was compared with that of the Tc-DTPA curve. Results: Average T of the Tc-DTPA renal perfusion curve was 16.2 seconds in the normal group and 39.6 seconds in the delayed perfusion group, while average T of the sonographic renal perfusion curve was 23.7 seconds and 46.2 seconds, respectively. T of the sonographic renal perfusion curve showed a good correlation with that of the Tc-DTPA curve (correlation coefficient=0.8209; p=0.0001). The cut-off value of T of the sonographic renal perfusion curve was 35 seconds (sensitivity=90%, specificity=95%). Conclusion: In patients who have received a renal transplant, the findings of renal perfusion imaging using harmonic US with a microbubble contrast agent show close correlation with those of Tc-DTPA renal perfusion imaging. The optimal cut-off value of Tpeak of the sonographic renal perfusion curve was 35 seconds
Key concepts: Perfusion, Medicine, Second-harmonic imaging microscopy, Ultrasound, Kidney, Contrast (vision), Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, Area under the curve