1971Acta Geologica PolonicaRequires access

Some remarks on the ontogenetic development and sexual dimorphism in the Ammonoidea

Henryk Makowski

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

The writer discusses the problem, suggested by some authors, of interpretation of small forms in Ammonoidea as neotenic ones. The classical conception of neoteny is connected with presence of a larval stage which in Ammonoidea was very tiny. It therefore appears that small forms in Ammonoidea are highly advanced in their ontogenetic development as compared with a larval stage of this group. Numerous examples are also known of the dimorphism, the large and small forms in which differ in their dimensions very indistinctly. The latter facts contradict a conception of a neotectonic character of small forms. The writer discusses also the problem of systematics of the Ammonoidea against the background of the commonly being accepted theory of sexual dimorphism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The writer discusses the problem, suggested by some authors, of interpretation of small forms in Ammonoidea as neotenic ones. The classical conception of neoteny is connected with presence of a larval stage which in Ammonoidea was very tiny. It therefore appears that small forms in Ammonoidea are highly advanced in their ontogenetic development as compared with a larval stage of this group. Numerous examples are also known of the dimorphism, the large and small forms in which differ in their dimensions very indistinctly. The latter facts contradict a conception of a neotectonic character of small forms. The writer discusses also the problem of systematics of the Ammonoidea against the background of the commonly being accepted theory of sexual dimorphism.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The writer discusses the problem, suggested by some authors, of interpretation of small forms in Ammonoidea as neotenic ones. The classical conception of neoteny is connected with presence of a larval stage which in Ammonoidea was very tiny. It therefore appears that small forms in Ammonoidea are highly advanced in their ontogenetic development as compared with a larval stage of this group. Numerous examples are also known of the dimorphism, the large and small forms in which differ in their dimensions very indistinctly. The latter facts contradict a conception of a neotectonic character of small forms. The writer discusses also the problem of systematics of the Ammonoidea against the background of the commonly being accepted theory of sexual dimorphism.

Key concepts: Ammonoidea, Neoteny, Sexual dimorphism, Paleontology, Ontogeny, Geology, Heterochrony, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Some remarks on the ontogenetic development and sexual dimorphism in the Ammonoidea — Research Paper | ScholarLens