2016•The Journal of Sexual MedicineRequires access

100 End Diastolic Velocity Versus Resistive Indices in Predicting Better Clinical Response Using Penile Doppler Ultrasound for Patients with Erectile Dysfunction

Casey O. McCraw, Zachary William Abraham Klaassen, Reena Kabaria, R. Chen, R. Lewis

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common disorder affecting millions of men worldwide. Penile Doppler (PD) is a useful modality to assess the functional underlying cause of the ED. PD can be used for evaluating different parameters of an erection including peak systolic velocity (PSV), End diastolic velocity (EDV), Resistive Indices (RI) and cavernosal artery diameter (CAD). These measurements can aid the physician in diagnoses and treatment. The objective of this study was to determine whether RI or EDV better predicts clinical response on PD for erectile dysfunction evaluation. Between July 2008 and February 2013, 472 consecutive patients were evaluated for ED with a PD ultrasound of which 465 patients had complete data. This cohort was then divided into three groups based on clinical response: 1) Clinical response 0 degrees (n=112, 24%), 2) Clinical response 0-45 degrees (n=226, 49%), 3) Clinical response greater than 45 degrees (n=127, 27%). Interquartile Range (IQR), Mean, median and Standard Deviation (SD) were then calculated for certain demographic data and PD parameters including EDV and RI (calculated (PSV-EDV)/PSV). Both parameters were calculated by best response regardless of cavernosal side. Demographic and PD ultrasound parameters between the groups were compared using descriptive statistics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common disorder affecting millions of men worldwide. Penile Doppler (PD) is a useful modality to assess the functional underlying cause of the ED. PD can be used for evaluating different parameters of an erection including peak systolic velocity (PSV), End diastolic velocity (EDV), Resistive Indices (RI) and cavernosal artery diameter (CAD). These measurements can aid the physician in diagnoses and treatment. The objective of this study was to determine whether RI or EDV better predicts clinical response on PD for erectile dysfunction evaluation. Between July 2008 and February 2013, 472 consecutive patients were evaluated for ED with a PD ultrasound of which 465 patients had complete data. This cohort was then divided into three groups based on clinical response: 1) Clinical response 0 degrees (n=112, 24%), 2) Clinical response 0-45 degrees (n=226, 49%), 3) Clinical response greater than 45 degrees (n=127, 27%). Interquartile Range (IQR), Mean, median and Standard Deviation (SD) were then calculated for certain demographic data and PD parameters including EDV and RI (calculated (PSV-EDV)/PSV). Both parameters were calculated by best response regardless of cavernosal side. Demographic and PD ultrasound parameters between the groups were compared using descriptive statistics.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common disorder affecting millions of men worldwide. Penile Doppler (PD) is a useful modality to assess the functional underlying cause of the ED. PD can be used for evaluating different parameters of an erection including peak systolic velocity (PSV), End diastolic velocity (EDV), Resistive Indices (RI) and cavernosal artery diameter (CAD). These measurements can aid the physician in diagnoses and treatment. The objective of this study was to determine whether RI or EDV better predicts clinical response on PD for erectile dysfunction evaluation. Between July 2008 and February 2013, 472 consecutive patients were evaluated for ED with a PD ultrasound of which 465 patients had complete data. This cohort was then divided into three groups based on clinical response: 1) Clinical response 0 degrees (n=112, 24%), 2) Clinical response 0-45 degrees (n=226, 49%), 3) Clinical response greater than 45 degrees (n=127, 27%). Interquartile Range (IQR), Mean, median and Standard Deviation (SD) were then calculated for certain demographic data and PD parameters including EDV and RI (calculated (PSV-EDV)/PSV). Both parameters were calculated by best response regardless of cavernosal side. Demographic and PD ultrasound parameters between the groups were compared using descriptive statistics.

Key concepts: Erectile dysfunction, Doppler ultrasound, Medicine, Doppler effect, Resistive touchscreen, Resistive index, Diastole, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
100 End Diastolic Velocity Versus Resistive Indices in Predicting Better Clinical Response Using Penile Doppler Ultrasound for Patients with Erectile Dysfunction — Research Paper | ScholarLens