2007Soil Survey HorizonsRequires access

A Field Comparison of Two Penetrometers

Eric C. Brevik

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Penetrometers are commonly used to measure select soil physical properties for agronomic and forestry applications. Static penetrometers are most frequently used, but they tend to have a limited range of soil resistance that can be measured by a single penetrometer, and reproducibility of readings can be problematic. This study compared the performance of a dynamic penetrometer designed for use in soils applications with that of a commercially available static pocket penetrometer. The dynamic penetrometer effectively measured a wider range of soil resistance, and the readings were less variable, indicating better reproducibility of readings with the dynamic penetrometer.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Penetrometers are commonly used to measure select soil physical properties for agronomic and forestry applications. Static penetrometers are most frequently used, but they tend to have a limited range of soil resistance that can be measured by a single penetrometer, and reproducibility of readings can be problematic. This study compared the performance of a dynamic penetrometer designed for use in soils applications with that of a commercially available static pocket penetrometer. The dynamic penetrometer effectively measured a wider range of soil resistance, and the readings were less variable, indicating better reproducibility of readings with the dynamic penetrometer.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Penetrometers are commonly used to measure select soil physical properties for agronomic and forestry applications. Static penetrometers are most frequently used, but they tend to have a limited range of soil resistance that can be measured by a single penetrometer, and reproducibility of readings can be problematic. This study compared the performance of a dynamic penetrometer designed for use in soils applications with that of a commercially available static pocket penetrometer. The dynamic penetrometer effectively measured a wider range of soil resistance, and the readings were less variable, indicating better reproducibility of readings with the dynamic penetrometer.

Key concepts: Penetrometer, Geotechnical engineering, Range (aeronautics), Environmental science, Soil water, Soil science, Geology, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Field Comparison of Two Penetrometers — Research Paper | ScholarLens