2016•The Astrophysical JournalOpen access

ERRATUM: “THE PROPER MOTION OF THE GALACTIC CENTER PULSAR RELATIVE TO SAGITTARIUS A*” (2015, ApJ, 798, 120)

Geoffrey C. Bower, Adam T. Deller, Paul B. Demorest, A. Brunthaler, H. Falcke, Monika A. Mościbrodzka, Ryan M. O’Leary, Ralph P. Eatough, Michael J. Kramer, K. J. Lee, Laura G. Spitler, G. Desvignes, A. Rushton, Sheperd S. Doeleman, Mark J. Reid

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

We used an incorrect value for the ICRF position of Sgr A * at the specified reference date to determine the relative position of the magnetar, PSR J1745-2900, in our analysis.The correct value for the Sgr A * position is 17h45m40.0366s,-29d00′28 217 at epoch MJD=56710.ICRF positions reported for the magnetar are correct as reported in the paper, but relative positions should be adjusted by (+18.36,-32.0) mas.This applies to individual epoch positions reported in columns 6 and 7 of Table 2 and the mean fitted positions reported in rows 1 and 2 of Table 4.For example, the correct fitted offset position using the proper motion bootstrap technique in Table 4 is +1700.53,-1679.41mas.The relative positions in Figure 1 should be shifted by the same offset.Proper motion, acceleration, and core shift values are unaffected.There are no changes in the interpretation of the results.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We used an incorrect value for the ICRF position of Sgr A * at the specified reference date to determine the relative position of the magnetar, PSR J1745-2900, in our analysis.The correct value for the Sgr A * position is 17h45m40.0366s,-29d00′28 217 at epoch MJD=56710.ICRF positions reported for the magnetar are correct as reported in the paper, but relative positions should be adjusted by (+18.36,-32.0) mas.This applies to individual epoch positions reported in columns 6 and 7 of Table 2 and the mean fitted positions reported in rows 1 and 2 of Table 4.For example, the correct fitted offset position using the proper motion bootstrap technique in Table 4 is +1700.53,-1679.41mas.The relative positions in Figure 1 should be shifted by the same offset.Proper motion, acceleration, and core shift values are unaffected.There are no changes in the interpretation of the results.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We used an incorrect value for the ICRF position of Sgr A * at the specified reference date to determine the relative position of the magnetar, PSR J1745-2900, in our analysis.The correct value for the Sgr A * position is 17h45m40.0366s,-29d00′28 217 at epoch MJD=56710.ICRF positions reported for the magnetar are correct as reported in the paper, but relative positions should be adjusted by (+18.36,-32.0) mas.This applies to individual epoch positions reported in columns 6 and 7 of Table 2 and the mean fitted positions reported in rows 1 and 2 of Table 4.For example, the correct fitted offset position using the proper motion bootstrap technique in Table 4 is +1700.53,-1679.41mas.The relative positions in Figure 1 should be shifted by the same offset.Proper motion, acceleration, and core shift values are unaffected.There are no changes in the interpretation of the results.

Key concepts: Physics, Galactic Center, Proper motion, Pulsar, Sagittarius, Astrophysics, Sagittarius A*, Astronomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ERRATUM: “THE PROPER MOTION OF THE GALACTIC CENTER PULSAR RELATIVE TO SAGITTARIUS A*” (2015, ApJ, 798, 120) — Research Paper | ScholarLens