2016bepress Legal RepositoryRequires access

Fiduciary Duties of Directors When Managing Intellectual Property

I.H. Donner

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The law covering corporate director duties pertaining to management of intellectual property assets is evolving, making it important for directors to remain up-to-date on any and all changes in management procedures and best practices. Generally, courts treat intellectual property assets like any other corporate asset, which means directors must approach intellectual property with the same due care as they would any other asset. \n For example, directors must be informed of the value of their intellectual property and always remember their duty of loyalty to their shareholders. Similarly, courts require directors to implement necessary internal controls to protect their corporation’s intellectual property assets. Finally, directors must refrain from misappropriating intellectual property.\n Recent cases include DuPont v. Medtronic Vascular, where the Superior Court of Delaware acknowledged that corporate officers and directors may have an affirmative duty to monetize their corporation’s intellectual property, including the use of litigation if necessary.Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Commission recently filed a complaint against CytoGenix Corporation, its president, Lex Cowsert, and a board member, Christopher Plummer, claiming the defendants lied to investors by issuing false press releases associated with an influenza vaccine’s development when the corporation had already lost all of its patents in a prior lawsuit.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The law covering corporate director duties pertaining to management of intellectual property assets is evolving, making it important for directors to remain up-to-date on any and all changes in management procedures and best practices. Generally, courts treat intellectual property assets like any other corporate asset, which means directors must approach intellectual property with the same due care as they would any other asset. \n For example, directors must be informed of the value of their intellectual property and always remember their duty of loyalty to their shareholders. Similarly, courts require directors to implement necessary internal controls to protect their corporation’s intellectual property assets. Finally, directors must refrain from misappropriating intellectual property.\n Recent cases include DuPont v. Medtronic Vascular, where the Superior Court of Delaware acknowledged that corporate officers and directors may have an affirmative duty to monetize their corporation’s intellectual property, including the use of litigation if necessary.Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Commission recently filed a complaint against CytoGenix Corporation, its president, Lex Cowsert, and a board member, Christopher Plummer, claiming the defendants lied to investors by issuing false press releases associated with an influenza vaccine’s development when the corporation had already lost all of its patents in a prior lawsuit.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The law covering corporate director duties pertaining to management of intellectual property assets is evolving, making it important for directors to remain up-to-date on any and all changes in management procedures and best practices. Generally, courts treat intellectual property assets like any other corporate asset, which means directors must approach intellectual property with the same due care as they would any other asset. \n For example, directors must be informed of the value of their intellectual property and always remember their duty of loyalty to their shareholders. Similarly, courts require directors to implement necessary internal controls to protect their corporation’s intellectual property assets. Finally, directors must refrain from misappropriating intellectual property.\n Recent cases include DuPont v. Medtronic Vascular, where the Superior Court of Delaware acknowledged that corporate officers and directors may have an affirmative duty to monetize their corporation’s intellectual property, including the use of litigation if necessary.Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Commission recently filed a complaint against CytoGenix Corporation, its president, Lex Cowsert, and a board member, Christopher Plummer, claiming the defendants lied to investors by issuing false press releases associated with an influenza vaccine’s development when the corporation had already lost all of its patents in a prior lawsuit.

Key concepts: Fiduciary, Corporation, Duty of loyalty, Scrutiny, Duty, Business, Business judgment rule, Corporate law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fiduciary Duties of Directors When Managing Intellectual Property — Research Paper | ScholarLens