Alterations in lung compliance and functional residual capacity with posture
Thomas P. K. Lim, U. C. Luft
Abstract
Thomas P. K. Lim, U. C. Luft
Abstract
Lung compliance and functional residual capacity were determined in the erect standing and the supine lying positions on six normal adults. Both lung compliance and functional residual capacity were proportionally reduced on resuming the supine from the standing position so that the ‘specific compliance’ remained the same at the two body positions. The correlation between lung compliance and FRC found in this study agrees well with that reported by others and the importance of considering the size of the system in assessing elastic properties of the lung is briefly discussed. Submitted on October 17, 1958
OpenAlex reports 51 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Lung compliance and functional residual capacity were determined in the erect standing and the supine lying positions on six normal adults. Both lung compliance and functional residual capacity were proportionally reduced on resuming the supine from the standing position so that the ‘specific compliance’ remained the same at the two body positions. The correlation between lung compliance and FRC found in this study agrees well with that reported by others and the importance of considering the size of the system in assessing elastic properties of the lung is briefly discussed. Submitted on October 17, 1958
Key concepts: Functional residual capacity, Supine position, Pulmonary compliance, Compliance (psychology), Lung volumes, Lung, Medicine, Body posture