1993•Unpublished venueRequires access

Cities and Uneven Economic Development

Mike Savage, Alan Warde

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Though best seen as an extended inquiry into the relationship between capitalism and modernity, urban sociology has characteristically concentrated on cities as sites of modernity, neglecting the way in which capitalist economic systems structure cities. In this chapter we draw on the work of urban geographers to show how cities need to be placed in the broader context of the world capitalist system. Such contextualisation, we argue, is important in specifying the relationship between different cities, and between cities and rural areas, so allowing the urban sociologist to avoid the mistake of seeing cities as self-contained objects with clear boundaries — as exemplars of a universal modernity. The significance of examining the economic bases of urban form is that it allows urban specificity to be comprehended, in terms of the particular role which different cities play within the worldwide economic system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Though best seen as an extended inquiry into the relationship between capitalism and modernity, urban sociology has characteristically concentrated on cities as sites of modernity, neglecting the way in which capitalist economic systems structure cities. In this chapter we draw on the work of urban geographers to show how cities need to be placed in the broader context of the world capitalist system. Such contextualisation, we argue, is important in specifying the relationship between different cities, and between cities and rural areas, so allowing the urban sociologist to avoid the mistake of seeing cities as self-contained objects with clear boundaries — as exemplars of a universal modernity. The significance of examining the economic bases of urban form is that it allows urban specificity to be comprehended, in terms of the particular role which different cities play within the worldwide economic system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Though best seen as an extended inquiry into the relationship between capitalism and modernity, urban sociology has characteristically concentrated on cities as sites of modernity, neglecting the way in which capitalist economic systems structure cities. In this chapter we draw on the work of urban geographers to show how cities need to be placed in the broader context of the world capitalist system. Such contextualisation, we argue, is important in specifying the relationship between different cities, and between cities and rural areas, so allowing the urban sociologist to avoid the mistake of seeing cities as self-contained objects with clear boundaries — as exemplars of a universal modernity. The significance of examining the economic bases of urban form is that it allows urban specificity to be comprehended, in terms of the particular role which different cities play within the worldwide economic system.

Key concepts: Modernity, Mistake, Capitalism, Context (archaeology), Sociology, Economic geography, Work (physics), Capitalist system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cities and Uneven Economic Development — Research Paper | ScholarLens