2013•Unpublished venueRequires access

Rethinking the Equity Risk Premium (a summary)

Elroy Dimson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Yet, there is no general consensus on the size of the equity premium. The range of equity premium estimates published in influential textbooks is astonishingly wide, in recent years spanning between 3% and 10% per year. To get a better estimate, we were thus motivated to (1) look back and see what equity premium had been realized over a long historical period and (2) determine what adjustments, if any, need to be made to such a historical measure for use as a guide to the future. In the context of the capital asset pricing model of Sharpe (1964) and others, the equity premium posits a relationship between the amount of risk taken and the expected return of an asset or portfolio. In other words, the equity premium is the market price of risk. The current time frame, in which real (inflationadjusted) yields on long-term government bonds are essentially zero, is unusual in that the equity premium is essentially the only source of real returns on assets.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Yet, there is no general consensus on the size of the equity premium. The range of equity premium estimates published in influential textbooks is astonishingly wide, in recent years spanning between 3% and 10% per year. To get a better estimate, we were thus motivated to (1) look back and see what equity premium had been realized over a long historical period and (2) determine what adjustments, if any, need to be made to such a historical measure for use as a guide to the future. In the context of the capital asset pricing model of Sharpe (1964) and others, the equity premium posits a relationship between the amount of risk taken and the expected return of an asset or portfolio. In other words, the equity premium is the market price of risk. The current time frame, in which real (inflationadjusted) yields on long-term government bonds are essentially zero, is unusual in that the equity premium is essentially the only source of real returns on assets.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Yet, there is no general consensus on the size of the equity premium. The range of equity premium estimates published in influential textbooks is astonishingly wide, in recent years spanning between 3% and 10% per year. To get a better estimate, we were thus motivated to (1) look back and see what equity premium had been realized over a long historical period and (2) determine what adjustments, if any, need to be made to such a historical measure for use as a guide to the future. In the context of the capital asset pricing model of Sharpe (1964) and others, the equity premium posits a relationship between the amount of risk taken and the expected return of an asset or portfolio. In other words, the equity premium is the market price of risk. The current time frame, in which real (inflationadjusted) yields on long-term government bonds are essentially zero, is unusual in that the equity premium is essentially the only source of real returns on assets.

Key concepts: Equity premium puzzle, Equity risk, Equity capital markets, Economics, Equity ratio, Financial economics, Risk premium, Capital asset pricing model

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rethinking the Equity Risk Premium (a summary) — Research Paper | ScholarLens