1991•Unpublished venueRequires access

GENOTYPE x ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND OPTIMAL NUMBER OF PROGENY TEST SITES FOR IMPROVING PINUS RADIATA IN NEW ZEALAND

Susan D. Biegel Carson

Open publisher page 49 citations

Abstract

A progeny test of 25 parents mated in a series of five, five-parent, disconnected diallels was established on 11 sites chosen to represent all major site types for growing Pinus radiata D. Don in New Zealand. Statistical analysis of an assessment at age 9 years suggested that for diameter, the most important trait in the New Zealand tree improvement programme, genotype x environment interaction was important. However, genetic gains predicted for diameter for several regionalisation options, using multi-site index selection, suggested that regionalisation of seed orchards would increase the average genetic gain in diameter over all sites only slightly. Further, many fewer than the full 11 sites were required for selection in order to capture essentially all of the predicted genetic gain for a national programme. Selection using the best site resulted in 90 % of the maximum possible predicted gain, but the poorest site only 23%. Sites which were "very good " for selection had rapid growth, high phenotypic variance, and high repeatability of general combining ability (GCA) effects. Sites which were "very poor " for selection had slow growth, low variance, and low repeatability.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A progeny test of 25 parents mated in a series of five, five-parent, disconnected diallels was established on 11 sites chosen to represent all major site types for growing Pinus radiata D. Don in New Zealand. Statistical analysis of an assessment at age 9 years suggested that for diameter, the most important trait in the New Zealand tree improvement programme, genotype x environment interaction was important. However, genetic gains predicted for diameter for several regionalisation options, using multi-site index selection, suggested that regionalisation of seed orchards would increase the average genetic gain in diameter over all sites only slightly. Further, many fewer than the full 11 sites were required for selection in order to capture essentially all of the predicted genetic gain for a national programme. Selection using the best site resulted in 90 % of the maximum possible predicted gain, but the poorest site only 23%. Sites which were "very good " for selection had rapid growth, high phenotypic variance, and high repeatability of general combining ability (GCA) effects. Sites which were "very poor " for selection had slow growth, low variance, and low repeatability.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 49 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A progeny test of 25 parents mated in a series of five, five-parent, disconnected diallels was established on 11 sites chosen to represent all major site types for growing Pinus radiata D. Don in New Zealand. Statistical analysis of an assessment at age 9 years suggested that for diameter, the most important trait in the New Zealand tree improvement programme, genotype x environment interaction was important. However, genetic gains predicted for diameter for several regionalisation options, using multi-site index selection, suggested that regionalisation of seed orchards would increase the average genetic gain in diameter over all sites only slightly. Further, many fewer than the full 11 sites were required for selection in order to capture essentially all of the predicted genetic gain for a national programme. Selection using the best site resulted in 90 % of the maximum possible predicted gain, but the poorest site only 23%. Sites which were "very good " for selection had rapid growth, high phenotypic variance, and high repeatability of general combining ability (GCA) effects. Sites which were "very poor " for selection had slow growth, low variance, and low repeatability.

Key concepts: Genetic gain, Pinus radiata, Trait, Selection (genetic algorithm), Gene–environment interaction, Biology, Regionalisation, Heritability

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
GENOTYPE x ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND OPTIMAL NUMBER OF PROGENY TEST SITES FOR IMPROVING PINUS RADIATA IN NEW ZEALAND — Research Paper | ScholarLens