1961American Journal of Enology and ViticultureRequires access

Review of Wine Industries' Sanitation Program

Almond D. Davison

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The progress of the Wine Institute Sanitation Program is encouraging. All of the sanitation subjects discussed have been applied somewhere in the wine industry. The results of the Wine Institute9s sanitation program, which began in 1946 and was reorganized in 1957 for more effective industry wide operation are: 1) Voluntary grape inspection by California Bureau of Fruit and Vegetable Standardization, Department of Agriculture. 2) Better harvesting and handling of grapes. 3) Better quality grapes delivered for wine. 4) Better sanitary conditions in the wineries brought about by expenditures for improvements, repairs, new equipment, personnel, and personnel training in sanitation procedures. 5) A sanitarian or winery worker in each winery who is responsible for sanitation in and around the winery. 6) A Wine Institute Sanitarian to act as consultant for the industry. The Technical Advisory Committee, the Wine Quality Committee and the various sub-committees of each are the agencies which Wine Institute can use to further explore any current and future problems. With Wine Institute disseminating the research data to the wineries, continued progress in the wine industries sanitation program can be expected. Attention also should be directed to the continued cooperation given to Wine Institute and members of the wine industry, by the staff of the University of California at Davis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The progress of the Wine Institute Sanitation Program is encouraging. All of the sanitation subjects discussed have been applied somewhere in the wine industry. The results of the Wine Institute9s sanitation program, which began in 1946 and was reorganized in 1957 for more effective industry wide operation are: 1) Voluntary grape inspection by California Bureau of Fruit and Vegetable Standardization, Department of Agriculture. 2) Better harvesting and handling of grapes. 3) Better quality grapes delivered for wine. 4) Better sanitary conditions in the wineries brought about by expenditures for improvements, repairs, new equipment, personnel, and personnel training in sanitation procedures. 5) A sanitarian or winery worker in each winery who is responsible for sanitation in and around the winery. 6) A Wine Institute Sanitarian to act as consultant for the industry. The Technical Advisory Committee, the Wine Quality Committee and the various sub-committees of each are the agencies which Wine Institute can use to further explore any current and future problems. With Wine Institute disseminating the research data to the wineries, continued progress in the wine industries sanitation program can be expected. Attention also should be directed to the continued cooperation given to Wine Institute and members of the wine industry, by the staff of the University of California at Davis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The progress of the Wine Institute Sanitation Program is encouraging. All of the sanitation subjects discussed have been applied somewhere in the wine industry. The results of the Wine Institute9s sanitation program, which began in 1946 and was reorganized in 1957 for more effective industry wide operation are: 1) Voluntary grape inspection by California Bureau of Fruit and Vegetable Standardization, Department of Agriculture. 2) Better harvesting and handling of grapes. 3) Better quality grapes delivered for wine. 4) Better sanitary conditions in the wineries brought about by expenditures for improvements, repairs, new equipment, personnel, and personnel training in sanitation procedures. 5) A sanitarian or winery worker in each winery who is responsible for sanitation in and around the winery. 6) A Wine Institute Sanitarian to act as consultant for the industry. The Technical Advisory Committee, the Wine Quality Committee and the various sub-committees of each are the agencies which Wine Institute can use to further explore any current and future problems. With Wine Institute disseminating the research data to the wineries, continued progress in the wine industries sanitation program can be expected. Attention also should be directed to the continued cooperation given to Wine Institute and members of the wine industry, by the staff of the University of California at Davis.

Key concepts: Winery, Sanitation, Wine, Business, Standardization, Quality (philosophy), Marketing, Wine grape

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Review of Wine Industries' Sanitation Program — Research Paper | ScholarLens