A Contrastive Genre Analysis of English Abstract in Linguistic Journals Written by Chinese and English Writers
郑翠, 郑莹
Abstract
郑翠, 郑莹
Abstract
This paper contrastively studies the generic structures of sixty abstracts from English teaching and learning journals written by Chinese writers and English native writers.Analysis of the data is based on Swales’ IMRD(Introduction-Method-Result-Discussion) model and all the data are coded through SPSS.Result indicates 1) English natives tend to write longer than Chinese.2) The rhetorical structure of the abstract tends to be more complete in the international journals.3) English natives tend to write more about the background details while the Chinese natives focus more on the result explanation.It is hoped that this comparison would shed some lights on abstract writing for Chinese writers.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper contrastively studies the generic structures of sixty abstracts from English teaching and learning journals written by Chinese writers and English native writers.Analysis of the data is based on Swales’ IMRD(Introduction-Method-Result-Discussion) model and all the data are coded through SPSS.Result indicates 1) English natives tend to write longer than Chinese.2) The rhetorical structure of the abstract tends to be more complete in the international journals.3) English natives tend to write more about the background details while the Chinese natives focus more on the result explanation.It is hoped that this comparison would shed some lights on abstract writing for Chinese writers.
Key concepts: Linguistics, Rhetorical question, Focus (optics), Genre analysis, Contrastive analysis, Computer science, History, Psychology