2015•Unpublished venueRequires access

FRC%TLC and RV%TLC to assess effects of lung disease: Comparison to FEV1%FVC

Adrian Hugh Kendrick

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) iis the point we breathe at and is the balance point between the chest wall and lung compliance. Hyperinflation is the ratio of FRC to total lung capacity (TLC), whilst gas trapping is the residual volume (RV) to TLC ratio. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients attending for static and dynamic volumes was undertaken. Static lung volumes were measured by body plethysmography. Airflow obstruction was defined as and FEV1%FVC <-1.64SR and a raised FRC%TLC and RV%TLC defined as >+1.64SR. Results: 3335 data sets were reviewed (1768 M; median age 54yrs (4-96). 1867(56%) had an FEV1%FVC <-1.64SR. Of these 132 (7.1%) had an FRC/TLC ratio >+1.64SR, of which 30(1.6%) had an SR>3.50. Similar results, but not always in the same patient was observed for the RV%TLC. There were significant correlations (p<0.0001) between FEV1%FVC SR and both FRC%TLC SR (r2=0.12) and RV%TLC SR (r2=0.31). ROC curves showed that for the FRC%TLC ratio, the AOC=0.81, sensitivity=81.7 (95%CI - 80.4 to 83.0) and specificity=55.9 (95%CI 54.3 to 57.6). For RV%TLC ratio, the AOC=0.77, sensitivity=77.3 (95%CI - 75.8 to 78.71) and specificity=53.6 (95%CI 51.9 to 55.3). Conclusion: The FRC%TLC is raised in 7% of patients without airflow obstruction, as is the RV%TLC. The worse the airflow obstruction, the greater the ratio observed. This suggests that the FEV1%FVC may not be account for some of the early changes in airway function.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) iis the point we breathe at and is the balance point between the chest wall and lung compliance. Hyperinflation is the ratio of FRC to total lung capacity (TLC), whilst gas trapping is the residual volume (RV) to TLC ratio. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients attending for static and dynamic volumes was undertaken. Static lung volumes were measured by body plethysmography. Airflow obstruction was defined as and FEV1%FVC <-1.64SR and a raised FRC%TLC and RV%TLC defined as >+1.64SR. Results: 3335 data sets were reviewed (1768 M; median age 54yrs (4-96). 1867(56%) had an FEV1%FVC <-1.64SR. Of these 132 (7.1%) had an FRC/TLC ratio >+1.64SR, of which 30(1.6%) had an SR>3.50. Similar results, but not always in the same patient was observed for the RV%TLC. There were significant correlations (p<0.0001) between FEV1%FVC SR and both FRC%TLC SR (r2=0.12) and RV%TLC SR (r2=0.31). ROC curves showed that for the FRC%TLC ratio, the AOC=0.81, sensitivity=81.7 (95%CI - 80.4 to 83.0) and specificity=55.9 (95%CI 54.3 to 57.6). For RV%TLC ratio, the AOC=0.77, sensitivity=77.3 (95%CI - 75.8 to 78.71) and specificity=53.6 (95%CI 51.9 to 55.3). Conclusion: The FRC%TLC is raised in 7% of patients without airflow obstruction, as is the RV%TLC. The worse the airflow obstruction, the greater the ratio observed. This suggests that the FEV1%FVC may not be account for some of the early changes in airway function.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) iis the point we breathe at and is the balance point between the chest wall and lung compliance. Hyperinflation is the ratio of FRC to total lung capacity (TLC), whilst gas trapping is the residual volume (RV) to TLC ratio. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients attending for static and dynamic volumes was undertaken. Static lung volumes were measured by body plethysmography. Airflow obstruction was defined as and FEV1%FVC <-1.64SR and a raised FRC%TLC and RV%TLC defined as >+1.64SR. Results: 3335 data sets were reviewed (1768 M; median age 54yrs (4-96). 1867(56%) had an FEV1%FVC <-1.64SR. Of these 132 (7.1%) had an FRC/TLC ratio >+1.64SR, of which 30(1.6%) had an SR>3.50. Similar results, but not always in the same patient was observed for the RV%TLC. There were significant correlations (p<0.0001) between FEV1%FVC SR and both FRC%TLC SR (r2=0.12) and RV%TLC SR (r2=0.31). ROC curves showed that for the FRC%TLC ratio, the AOC=0.81, sensitivity=81.7 (95%CI - 80.4 to 83.0) and specificity=55.9 (95%CI 54.3 to 57.6). For RV%TLC ratio, the AOC=0.77, sensitivity=77.3 (95%CI - 75.8 to 78.71) and specificity=53.6 (95%CI 51.9 to 55.3). Conclusion: The FRC%TLC is raised in 7% of patients without airflow obstruction, as is the RV%TLC. The worse the airflow obstruction, the greater the ratio observed. This suggests that the FEV1%FVC may not be account for some of the early changes in airway function.

Key concepts: Medicine, Air trapping, Lung volumes, Plethysmograph, Functional residual capacity, Nuclear medicine, Residual volume, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
FRC%TLC and RV%TLC to assess effects of lung disease: Comparison to FEV1%FVC — Research Paper | ScholarLens