2016•Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

Improved Annual Average Daily Traffic Estimation Processes

Steven Jessberger, Robert T. Krile, Jeremy Schroeder, Frederick R. Todt, Jingyu Feng

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Annual average daily traffic (AADT) volume is estimated for federal, state, and local uses for roadway segments throughout the United States. The AADT estimates derived from permanent or portable counts are critical to roadway planning, system operations, and distribution of funding. The AASHTO AADT estimation formula is the most commonly used method, in part because it can be used under many circumstances when hourly traffic volume observations are missing, which is a common measurement issue with permanent traffic-counting sites. Despite its utility, the AASHTO AADT method has limitations in that it requires complete hourly data for any day that is included, and it does not account for variations in the numbers of each day of the week within a month or variations in the number of days within a month. This research evaluated new AADT estimation methods that incorporate days in which some, but not all, hourly observations are available and adjusts volume for the number of times each day of the week occurs in a month and the number of days per month. The bias and precision of four methods were examined for AADT estimation from hundreds of permanent traffic-counting sites. The analysis used more than 48 million records from the FHWA Travel Monitoring Analysis System, covering 14 years (2000 through 2013). This research quantified the improvement in accuracy and precision of the new methods, which effectively allow for a greater proportion of data to be retained in the estimation formula.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Annual average daily traffic (AADT) volume is estimated for federal, state, and local uses for roadway segments throughout the United States. The AADT estimates derived from permanent or portable counts are critical to roadway planning, system operations, and distribution of funding. The AASHTO AADT estimation formula is the most commonly used method, in part because it can be used under many circumstances when hourly traffic volume observations are missing, which is a common measurement issue with permanent traffic-counting sites. Despite its utility, the AASHTO AADT method has limitations in that it requires complete hourly data for any day that is included, and it does not account for variations in the numbers of each day of the week within a month or variations in the number of days within a month. This research evaluated new AADT estimation methods that incorporate days in which some, but not all, hourly observations are available and adjusts volume for the number of times each day of the week occurs in a month and the number of days per month. The bias and precision of four methods were examined for AADT estimation from hundreds of permanent traffic-counting sites. The analysis used more than 48 million records from the FHWA Travel Monitoring Analysis System, covering 14 years (2000 through 2013). This research quantified the improvement in accuracy and precision of the new methods, which effectively allow for a greater proportion of data to be retained in the estimation formula.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Annual average daily traffic (AADT) volume is estimated for federal, state, and local uses for roadway segments throughout the United States. The AADT estimates derived from permanent or portable counts are critical to roadway planning, system operations, and distribution of funding. The AASHTO AADT estimation formula is the most commonly used method, in part because it can be used under many circumstances when hourly traffic volume observations are missing, which is a common measurement issue with permanent traffic-counting sites. Despite its utility, the AASHTO AADT method has limitations in that it requires complete hourly data for any day that is included, and it does not account for variations in the numbers of each day of the week within a month or variations in the number of days within a month. This research evaluated new AADT estimation methods that incorporate days in which some, but not all, hourly observations are available and adjusts volume for the number of times each day of the week occurs in a month and the number of days per month. The bias and precision of four methods were examined for AADT estimation from hundreds of permanent traffic-counting sites. The analysis used more than 48 million records from the FHWA Travel Monitoring Analysis System, covering 14 years (2000 through 2013). This research quantified the improvement in accuracy and precision of the new methods, which effectively allow for a greater proportion of data to be retained in the estimation formula.

Key concepts: Traffic count, Statistics, Traffic volume, Estimation, Environmental science, Volume (thermodynamics), Transport engineering, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Improved Annual Average Daily Traffic Estimation Processes — Research Paper | ScholarLens