2016American Journal of RoentgenologyRequires access

Free-Breathing Radial 3D Fat-Suppressed T1-Weighted Gradient-Echo Sequence for Contrast-Enhanced Pediatric Spinal Imaging: Comparison With T1-Weighted Turbo Spin-Echo Sequence

Hyun‐Hae Cho, Young Hun Choi, Jung‐Eun Cheon, So Mi Lee, Woo Sun Kim, In-One Kim, Mun Young Paek

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare free-breathing radially sampled 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo acquisitions (radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination [VIBE]) with a T1-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence for contrast-enhanced spinal imaging of children with CNS tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutively registered children with CNS tumors underwent evaluation of leptomeningeal seeding with 1.5-T MRI that included both radial VIBE and T1-weighted TSE sequences. For qualitative analysis, overall image quality; presence of motion, CSF flow, and radial artifacts; and lesion conspicuity were retrospectively assessed with scoring systems. The signal-intensity uniformity of each sequence was evaluated for quantitative comparison. The acquisition times for each sequence were compared. RESULTS: Images obtained with the radial VIBE sequence had a higher overall image quality score than did T1-weighted TSE images (3.61 ± 0.73 vs 2.80 ± 0.69, p < 0.001) and lower motion artifact (0.82 ± 0.43 vs 1.29 ± 0.56, p = 0.001) and CSF flow artifact (0 vs 1.68 ± 0.67, p < 0.001) scores. Radial artifacts were found only on radial VIBE images (1.36 ± 0.31 vs 0, p < 0.001). In 13 patients with spinal seeding nodules, radial VIBE images showed greater lesion conspicuity than did T1-weighted TSE images (4.23 ± 0.52 vs 2.47 ± 0.57, p = 0.005). Radial VIBE images had diminished signal-intensity variation compared with T1-weighted TSE images in air, spine, and muscle (p < 0.01). The mean acquisition times were not significantly different between the two sequences (p = 0.117). CONCLUSION: For pediatric spinal imaging, radial VIBE images had better image quality and lesion conspicuity and fewer CSF and respiratory motion artifacts than did T1-weighted TSE images in a similar acquisition time.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare free-breathing radially sampled 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo acquisitions (radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination [VIBE]) with a T1-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence for contrast-enhanced spinal imaging of children with CNS tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutively registered children with CNS tumors underwent evaluation of leptomeningeal seeding with 1.5-T MRI that included both radial VIBE and T1-weighted TSE sequences. For qualitative analysis, overall image quality; presence of motion, CSF flow, and radial artifacts; and lesion conspicuity were retrospectively assessed with scoring systems. The signal-intensity uniformity of each sequence was evaluated for quantitative comparison. The acquisition times for each sequence were compared. RESULTS: Images obtained with the radial VIBE sequence had a higher overall image quality score than did T1-weighted TSE images (3.61 ± 0.73 vs 2.80 ± 0.69, p < 0.001) and lower motion artifact (0.82 ± 0.43 vs 1.29 ± 0.56, p = 0.001) and CSF flow artifact (0 vs 1.68 ± 0.67, p < 0.001) scores. Radial artifacts were found only on radial VIBE images (1.36 ± 0.31 vs 0, p < 0.001). In 13 patients with spinal seeding nodules, radial VIBE images showed greater lesion conspicuity than did T1-weighted TSE images (4.23 ± 0.52 vs 2.47 ± 0.57, p = 0.005). Radial VIBE images had diminished signal-intensity variation compared with T1-weighted TSE images in air, spine, and muscle (p < 0.01). The mean acquisition times were not significantly different between the two sequences (p = 0.117). CONCLUSION: For pediatric spinal imaging, radial VIBE images had better image quality and lesion conspicuity and fewer CSF and respiratory motion artifacts than did T1-weighted TSE images in a similar acquisition time.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare free-breathing radially sampled 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo acquisitions (radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination [VIBE]) with a T1-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence for contrast-enhanced spinal imaging of children with CNS tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutively registered children with CNS tumors underwent evaluation of leptomeningeal seeding with 1.5-T MRI that included both radial VIBE and T1-weighted TSE sequences. For qualitative analysis, overall image quality; presence of motion, CSF flow, and radial artifacts; and lesion conspicuity were retrospectively assessed with scoring systems. The signal-intensity uniformity of each sequence was evaluated for quantitative comparison. The acquisition times for each sequence were compared. RESULTS: Images obtained with the radial VIBE sequence had a higher overall image quality score than did T1-weighted TSE images (3.61 ± 0.73 vs 2.80 ± 0.69, p < 0.001) and lower motion artifact (0.82 ± 0.43 vs 1.29 ± 0.56, p = 0.001) and CSF flow artifact (0 vs 1.68 ± 0.67, p < 0.001) scores. Radial artifacts were found only on radial VIBE images (1.36 ± 0.31 vs 0, p < 0.001). In 13 patients with spinal seeding nodules, radial VIBE images showed greater lesion conspicuity than did T1-weighted TSE images (4.23 ± 0.52 vs 2.47 ± 0.57, p = 0.005). Radial VIBE images had diminished signal-intensity variation compared with T1-weighted TSE images in air, spine, and muscle (p < 0.01). The mean acquisition times were not significantly different between the two sequences (p = 0.117). CONCLUSION: For pediatric spinal imaging, radial VIBE images had better image quality and lesion conspicuity and fewer CSF and respiratory motion artifacts than did T1-weighted TSE images in a similar acquisition time.

Key concepts: Fast spin echo, Medicine, Gradient echo, Nuclear magnetic resonance, Contrast (vision), Sequence (biology), Turbo, Spin echo

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Free-Breathing Radial 3D Fat-Suppressed T1-Weighted Gradient-Echo Sequence for Contrast-Enhanced Pediatric Spinal Imaging: Comparison With T1-Weighted Turbo Spin-Echo Sequence — Research Paper | ScholarLens