2013•Unpublished venueRequires access

Application of a Hypothesis to Speciation in Hominidae

George E. Parris

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

I have previously hypothesized that biological species are not the result of gradual changes in the genome or morphology as suggested by Darwin, but rather the result of punctuated major pericentric or paracentric inversions or other rearrangements (e.g., chromosome fusions) that prevent reproductive compatibility with the parent group.  Following the rearrangement, a new nascent species can be formed through inbreeding within two generations consistent with the views of Goldschmidt.  Applying this hypothesis to speciation in Hominidae (the great apes) suggests that (i) orangutans are close to the common ancestor of Hominidae; (ii) humans are close to the common ancestor of Hominoids, which was adapted for efficient all-terrain locomotion; (iii) gorillas and chimpanzees have passed though more species as they have adapted to a very specialized ecological niche in the tropical forest, and (iv) speciation events in Homo facilitated evolution of the human brain.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I have previously hypothesized that biological species are not the result of gradual changes in the genome or morphology as suggested by Darwin, but rather the result of punctuated major pericentric or paracentric inversions or other rearrangements (e.g., chromosome fusions) that prevent reproductive compatibility with the parent group.  Following the rearrangement, a new nascent species can be formed through inbreeding within two generations consistent with the views of Goldschmidt.  Applying this hypothesis to speciation in Hominidae (the great apes) suggests that (i) orangutans are close to the common ancestor of Hominidae; (ii) humans are close to the common ancestor of Hominoids, which was adapted for efficient all-terrain locomotion; (iii) gorillas and chimpanzees have passed though more species as they have adapted to a very specialized ecological niche in the tropical forest, and (iv) speciation events in Homo facilitated evolution of the human brain.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I have previously hypothesized that biological species are not the result of gradual changes in the genome or morphology as suggested by Darwin, but rather the result of punctuated major pericentric or paracentric inversions or other rearrangements (e.g., chromosome fusions) that prevent reproductive compatibility with the parent group.  Following the rearrangement, a new nascent species can be formed through inbreeding within two generations consistent with the views of Goldschmidt.  Applying this hypothesis to speciation in Hominidae (the great apes) suggests that (i) orangutans are close to the common ancestor of Hominidae; (ii) humans are close to the common ancestor of Hominoids, which was adapted for efficient all-terrain locomotion; (iii) gorillas and chimpanzees have passed though more species as they have adapted to a very specialized ecological niche in the tropical forest, and (iv) speciation events in Homo facilitated evolution of the human brain.

Key concepts: Hominidae, Evolutionary biology, Biology, Most recent common ancestor, Genetic algorithm, Homo erectus, Ancestor, Molecular clock

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Application of a Hypothesis to Speciation in Hominidae — Research Paper | ScholarLens