1986New England Journal of MedicineRequires access

The Case for the Use of Animals in Biomedical Research

Carl I. Cohen

Open publisher page 364 citations

Abstract

USING animals as research subjects in medical investigations is widely condemned on two grounds: first, because it wrongly violates the rights of animals,1 and second, because it wrongly imposes on sentient creatures much avoidable suffering.2 Neither of these arguments is sound. The first relies on a mistaken understanding of rights; the second relies on a mistaken calculation of consequences. Both deserve definitive dismissal.Why Animals Have No RightsA right, properly understood, is a claim, or potential claim, that one party may exercise against another. The target against whom such a claim may be registered can be a single . . .

About this research paper

What this paper is about

USING animals as research subjects in medical investigations is widely condemned on two grounds: first, because it wrongly violates the rights of animals,1 and second, because it wrongly imposes on sentient creatures much avoidable suffering.2 Neither of these arguments is sound. The first relies on a mistaken understanding of rights; the second relies on a mistaken calculation of consequences. Both deserve definitive dismissal.Why Animals Have No RightsA right, properly understood, is a claim, or potential claim, that one party may exercise against another. The target against whom such a claim may be registered can be a single . . .

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 364 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

USING animals as research subjects in medical investigations is widely condemned on two grounds: first, because it wrongly violates the rights of animals,1 and second, because it wrongly imposes on sentient creatures much avoidable suffering.2 Neither of these arguments is sound. The first relies on a mistaken understanding of rights; the second relies on a mistaken calculation of consequences. Both deserve definitive dismissal.Why Animals Have No RightsA right, properly understood, is a claim, or potential claim, that one party may exercise against another. The target against whom such a claim may be registered can be a single . . .

Key concepts: Creatures, Dismissal, Animal rights, Medicine, Law and economics, Law, Epistemology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Case for the Use of Animals in Biomedical Research — Research Paper | ScholarLens