1997Japanese Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial SurgeryOpen access

Study of bacteria isolated from infections of the oral and maxillofacial region. Part 2. Anaerobes.

Tomoari Kuriyama, Kiyomasa Nakagawa, Etsuhide Yamamoto, Yasumasa Saiki, Toshimi Muroki, Nario Matsumoto

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Eighty-six cases of obstructed abscesses in the oral and maxillofacial region were studied bacteriologic ally.Isolated anaerobic organisms were identified in detail and assessed with regard to antimicrobial susceptibility to several agents. Anaerobes were isolated from approximately 95% of cases that had isolated organisms. Gram-positive cocci, including Peptostreptococcus and Gemella, and gram-negative rods, including Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Fusobacterium, were isolated frequently. As for antimicrobial susceptibility, some strains of Prevotella were resistant to β-lactam agents. In particular, many strains of Fusobacterium were resistant to erythromycin. Clindamycin and levofloxacin were highly active against anaerobes isolated from infections in the oral and maxillofacial region.Our results suggest that anaerobes as well as Streptococcus should be considered when treating infections in the oral and maxillofacial region.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Eighty-six cases of obstructed abscesses in the oral and maxillofacial region were studied bacteriologic ally.Isolated anaerobic organisms were identified in detail and assessed with regard to antimicrobial susceptibility to several agents. Anaerobes were isolated from approximately 95% of cases that had isolated organisms. Gram-positive cocci, including Peptostreptococcus and Gemella, and gram-negative rods, including Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Fusobacterium, were isolated frequently. As for antimicrobial susceptibility, some strains of Prevotella were resistant to β-lactam agents. In particular, many strains of Fusobacterium were resistant to erythromycin. Clindamycin and levofloxacin were highly active against anaerobes isolated from infections in the oral and maxillofacial region.Our results suggest that anaerobes as well as Streptococcus should be considered when treating infections in the oral and maxillofacial region.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Eighty-six cases of obstructed abscesses in the oral and maxillofacial region were studied bacteriologic ally.Isolated anaerobic organisms were identified in detail and assessed with regard to antimicrobial susceptibility to several agents. Anaerobes were isolated from approximately 95% of cases that had isolated organisms. Gram-positive cocci, including Peptostreptococcus and Gemella, and gram-negative rods, including Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Fusobacterium, were isolated frequently. As for antimicrobial susceptibility, some strains of Prevotella were resistant to β-lactam agents. In particular, many strains of Fusobacterium were resistant to erythromycin. Clindamycin and levofloxacin were highly active against anaerobes isolated from infections in the oral and maxillofacial region.Our results suggest that anaerobes as well as Streptococcus should be considered when treating infections in the oral and maxillofacial region.

Key concepts: Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Microbiology, Prevotella, Clindamycin, Anaerobic bacteria, Medicine, Antimicrobial

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study of bacteria isolated from infections of the oral and maxillofacial region. Part 2. Anaerobes. — Research Paper | ScholarLens