1987Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan / Atomic Energy Society of JapanOpen access

Numerical diffusion in multi-dimensional thermal-hydraulic analysis. (II). Comparison of higher order differencing schemes.

Isamu Maekawa

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Various higher order differencing schemes for the convection terms in transport equations are investigated through basic numerical experiments in two-dimensional flow fields. The numerical schemes examined include the first order upwind, the second order upwind, the third order upwind, the QUICK, the QUICK-FRAM and the modified EXQUISITE schemes. In the numerical experiments, four test problems including steady-state and transient phenomena are calculated using these schemes. From the comparisons among the calculated results, following results are obtained:(1) The third order upwind and the QUICK schemes minimize numerical diffusion.(2) These schemes, however, suffer from unrealistic numerical wiggles locally and the wiggles often degrade their solutions.(3) The QUICK-FRAM and the modified EXQUISITE schemes can suppress the numerical wiggles without the marked degradation of the performance of the QUICK scheme for the numerical diffusion.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Various higher order differencing schemes for the convection terms in transport equations are investigated through basic numerical experiments in two-dimensional flow fields. The numerical schemes examined include the first order upwind, the second order upwind, the third order upwind, the QUICK, the QUICK-FRAM and the modified EXQUISITE schemes. In the numerical experiments, four test problems including steady-state and transient phenomena are calculated using these schemes. From the comparisons among the calculated results, following results are obtained:(1) The third order upwind and the QUICK schemes minimize numerical diffusion.(2) These schemes, however, suffer from unrealistic numerical wiggles locally and the wiggles often degrade their solutions.(3) The QUICK-FRAM and the modified EXQUISITE schemes can suppress the numerical wiggles without the marked degradation of the performance of the QUICK scheme for the numerical diffusion.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Various higher order differencing schemes for the convection terms in transport equations are investigated through basic numerical experiments in two-dimensional flow fields. The numerical schemes examined include the first order upwind, the second order upwind, the third order upwind, the QUICK, the QUICK-FRAM and the modified EXQUISITE schemes. In the numerical experiments, four test problems including steady-state and transient phenomena are calculated using these schemes. From the comparisons among the calculated results, following results are obtained:(1) The third order upwind and the QUICK schemes minimize numerical diffusion.(2) These schemes, however, suffer from unrealistic numerical wiggles locally and the wiggles often degrade their solutions.(3) The QUICK-FRAM and the modified EXQUISITE schemes can suppress the numerical wiggles without the marked degradation of the performance of the QUICK scheme for the numerical diffusion.

Key concepts: Numerical diffusion, Upwind scheme, Numerical analysis, Computer simulation, Diffusion, Transient (computer programming), Convection–diffusion equation, Applied mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Numerical diffusion in multi-dimensional thermal-hydraulic analysis. (II). Comparison of higher order differencing schemes. — Research Paper | ScholarLens