Numerical diffusion in multi-dimensional thermal-hydraulic analysis. (II). Comparison of higher order differencing schemes.
Isamu Maekawa
Abstract
Open-access reader
Isamu Maekawa
Abstract
Open-access reader
Various higher order differencing schemes for the convection terms in transport equations are investigated through basic numerical experiments in two-dimensional flow fields. The numerical schemes examined include the first order upwind, the second order upwind, the third order upwind, the QUICK, the QUICK-FRAM and the modified EXQUISITE schemes. In the numerical experiments, four test problems including steady-state and transient phenomena are calculated using these schemes. From the comparisons among the calculated results, following results are obtained:(1) The third order upwind and the QUICK schemes minimize numerical diffusion.(2) These schemes, however, suffer from unrealistic numerical wiggles locally and the wiggles often degrade their solutions.(3) The QUICK-FRAM and the modified EXQUISITE schemes can suppress the numerical wiggles without the marked degradation of the performance of the QUICK scheme for the numerical diffusion.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Various higher order differencing schemes for the convection terms in transport equations are investigated through basic numerical experiments in two-dimensional flow fields. The numerical schemes examined include the first order upwind, the second order upwind, the third order upwind, the QUICK, the QUICK-FRAM and the modified EXQUISITE schemes. In the numerical experiments, four test problems including steady-state and transient phenomena are calculated using these schemes. From the comparisons among the calculated results, following results are obtained:(1) The third order upwind and the QUICK schemes minimize numerical diffusion.(2) These schemes, however, suffer from unrealistic numerical wiggles locally and the wiggles often degrade their solutions.(3) The QUICK-FRAM and the modified EXQUISITE schemes can suppress the numerical wiggles without the marked degradation of the performance of the QUICK scheme for the numerical diffusion.
Key concepts: Numerical diffusion, Upwind scheme, Numerical analysis, Computer simulation, Diffusion, Transient (computer programming), Convection–diffusion equation, Applied mathematics