2016The Journal of Physical Chemistry CRequires access

Mechanistic Insight into the C2 Hydrocarbons Formation from Syngas on fcc-Co(111) Surface: A DFT Study

Congbiao Chen, Qiang Wang, Guiru Wang, Bo Hou, Litao Jia, Debao Li

Open publisher page 54 citations

Abstract

A comprehensive density functional theory (DFT) calculation of C 2 hydrocarbons formation in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) on the close-packed fcc-Co(111) surface has been carried out. The activation barriers and reaction energies for CO dissociation, CH x hydrogenation, CH x + CH y coupling and C(HO) insertion into CH x, CH x CH y –O bond scission, and successive hydrogenation reactions involved in C 2 hydrocarbons formation have been examined, and the following conclusions could be concluded: (i) CH is the dominant monomer, which is formed via CO + H → CHO → CH + O; (ii) CHO insertion is more plausible for C–C chain formation compared with CO insertion and CH x –CH y coupling. The rate-determining steps for C 2 hydrocarbons are CO + H → CHO and CHCH + H → CH 2 CH. Meanwhile, CH 3 hydrogenation to form CH 4 is more facile than C 2 hydrocarbons, which will lead to the low productivity and selectivity to C 2 hydrocarbons. (iii) Stepped-Co(111) surface has been modeled to clarify the role of defects during C 2 hydrocarbons formation, and the calculation results indicate that CHO and CH 2 CH formation could be facilitated and CH 4 formation could be suppressed, suggesting that the step sites could effectively promote the catalytic activity and selectivity for C 2 hydrocarbons formation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A comprehensive density functional theory (DFT) calculation of C 2 hydrocarbons formation in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) on the close-packed fcc-Co(111) surface has been carried out. The activation barriers and reaction energies for CO dissociation, CH x hydrogenation, CH x + CH y coupling and C(HO) insertion into CH x, CH x CH y –O bond scission, and successive hydrogenation reactions involved in C 2 hydrocarbons formation have been examined, and the following conclusions could be concluded: (i) CH is the dominant monomer, which is formed via CO + H → CHO → CH + O; (ii) CHO insertion is more plausible for C–C chain formation compared with CO insertion and CH x –CH y coupling. The rate-determining steps for C 2 hydrocarbons are CO + H → CHO and CHCH + H → CH 2 CH. Meanwhile, CH 3 hydrogenation to form CH 4 is more facile than C 2 hydrocarbons, which will lead to the low productivity and selectivity to C 2 hydrocarbons. (iii) Stepped-Co(111) surface has been modeled to clarify the role of defects during C 2 hydrocarbons formation, and the calculation results indicate that CHO and CH 2 CH formation could be facilitated and CH 4 formation could be suppressed, suggesting that the step sites could effectively promote the catalytic activity and selectivity for C 2 hydrocarbons formation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 54 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A comprehensive density functional theory (DFT) calculation of C 2 hydrocarbons formation in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) on the close-packed fcc-Co(111) surface has been carried out. The activation barriers and reaction energies for CO dissociation, CH x hydrogenation, CH x + CH y coupling and C(HO) insertion into CH x, CH x CH y –O bond scission, and successive hydrogenation reactions involved in C 2 hydrocarbons formation have been examined, and the following conclusions could be concluded: (i) CH is the dominant monomer, which is formed via CO + H → CHO → CH + O; (ii) CHO insertion is more plausible for C–C chain formation compared with CO insertion and CH x –CH y coupling. The rate-determining steps for C 2 hydrocarbons are CO + H → CHO and CHCH + H → CH 2 CH. Meanwhile, CH 3 hydrogenation to form CH 4 is more facile than C 2 hydrocarbons, which will lead to the low productivity and selectivity to C 2 hydrocarbons. (iii) Stepped-Co(111) surface has been modeled to clarify the role of defects during C 2 hydrocarbons formation, and the calculation results indicate that CHO and CH 2 CH formation could be facilitated and CH 4 formation could be suppressed, suggesting that the step sites could effectively promote the catalytic activity and selectivity for C 2 hydrocarbons formation.

Key concepts: Chemistry, Dissociation (chemistry), Selectivity, Syngas, Hydrocarbon, Catalysis, Density functional theory, Bond cleavage

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mechanistic Insight into the C2 Hydrocarbons Formation from Syngas on fcc-Co(111) Surface: A DFT Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens