1994The journal of the Japanese Practical Surgeon SocietyOpen access

A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE ULTRASONOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS ON ACUTE APPENDICITIS

Masataka Ikeda, Masayuki Tatsuta, Takashi SATOMI, Fumihiko Kimura, Masaki Okuyama, Terumasa Yamada, K Ishikawa, Osamu Hoshi, Takatoshi KAWASAKI

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

To evaluate the availability of Ultrasonography (US) on acute appendicitis, criteria based on the muscle layer of visualized appendix for grading appendicitis such as catarrhal, phlengmonous, and gangrenous appendicitis, was made on three hundred and twelve consecutive patients on whom were performed US with clinically suspected appendicitis. A prospective study was then performed with criteria for surgical intervention, consisted of visualization of phlegmonous or gangrenous appendix and ancillary findings (ascites, typhlitis, suspected abscess formation, and fecalith). US diagnosis for appendi-citis has proved to have an over all accuracy rate of 95.8% and for grading appendicitis 82.6%. The sensitivity of US criteria for surgical intervention was 96.3%, with a specificity of 93.5%. The overall accuracy was 94.2%. There results indicate that US has proved to be of clinical value. In 4 cases of catarrhal appendicitis and one case of unknown peritonitis were treated conservatively under these criteria, surgery was required later. Three children of these 5 cases had perforated peritonitis and two adults of these had not at laparotomy. In conclusion, it is necessary to closely follow up clinical symptoms with US, even on catarrhal cases, and early laparotomy can be justified, especially on some child cases.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To evaluate the availability of Ultrasonography (US) on acute appendicitis, criteria based on the muscle layer of visualized appendix for grading appendicitis such as catarrhal, phlengmonous, and gangrenous appendicitis, was made on three hundred and twelve consecutive patients on whom were performed US with clinically suspected appendicitis. A prospective study was then performed with criteria for surgical intervention, consisted of visualization of phlegmonous or gangrenous appendix and ancillary findings (ascites, typhlitis, suspected abscess formation, and fecalith). US diagnosis for appendi-citis has proved to have an over all accuracy rate of 95.8% and for grading appendicitis 82.6%. The sensitivity of US criteria for surgical intervention was 96.3%, with a specificity of 93.5%. The overall accuracy was 94.2%. There results indicate that US has proved to be of clinical value. In 4 cases of catarrhal appendicitis and one case of unknown peritonitis were treated conservatively under these criteria, surgery was required later. Three children of these 5 cases had perforated peritonitis and two adults of these had not at laparotomy. In conclusion, it is necessary to closely follow up clinical symptoms with US, even on catarrhal cases, and early laparotomy can be justified, especially on some child cases.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To evaluate the availability of Ultrasonography (US) on acute appendicitis, criteria based on the muscle layer of visualized appendix for grading appendicitis such as catarrhal, phlengmonous, and gangrenous appendicitis, was made on three hundred and twelve consecutive patients on whom were performed US with clinically suspected appendicitis. A prospective study was then performed with criteria for surgical intervention, consisted of visualization of phlegmonous or gangrenous appendix and ancillary findings (ascites, typhlitis, suspected abscess formation, and fecalith). US diagnosis for appendi-citis has proved to have an over all accuracy rate of 95.8% and for grading appendicitis 82.6%. The sensitivity of US criteria for surgical intervention was 96.3%, with a specificity of 93.5%. The overall accuracy was 94.2%. There results indicate that US has proved to be of clinical value. In 4 cases of catarrhal appendicitis and one case of unknown peritonitis were treated conservatively under these criteria, surgery was required later. Three children of these 5 cases had perforated peritonitis and two adults of these had not at laparotomy. In conclusion, it is necessary to closely follow up clinical symptoms with US, even on catarrhal cases, and early laparotomy can be justified, especially on some child cases.

Key concepts: Medicine, Appendicitis, Laparotomy, Acute appendicitis, Appendix, Abscess, Prospective cohort study, Peritonitis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE ULTRASONOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS ON ACUTE APPENDICITIS — Research Paper | ScholarLens