Aneuploidy Screening
Richard L. Berkowitz, Howard Cuckle, Ronald J. Wapner, Mary E. D’Alton
Abstract
Richard L. Berkowitz, Howard Cuckle, Ronald J. Wapner, Mary E. D’Alton
Abstract
In Brief Screening for the risk of fetal aneuploidy can be effectively performed in either the first or second trimester. When obtained independently, the interpretation of those data is straightforward. However, the effectiveness of screening can be enhanced by combining studies performed in each trimester in a variety of ways. In this commentary we will define and discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of using integrated, stepwise, sequential or contingency screening for risk assessment of fetal aneuploidy. The effectiveness of screening for fetal aneuploidies can be enhanced by combining firstand second-trimester studies in different ways.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In Brief Screening for the risk of fetal aneuploidy can be effectively performed in either the first or second trimester. When obtained independently, the interpretation of those data is straightforward. However, the effectiveness of screening can be enhanced by combining studies performed in each trimester in a variety of ways. In this commentary we will define and discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of using integrated, stepwise, sequential or contingency screening for risk assessment of fetal aneuploidy. The effectiveness of screening for fetal aneuploidies can be enhanced by combining firstand second-trimester studies in different ways.
Key concepts: Aneuploidy, Medicine, Second trimester, First trimester, Fetus, Obstetrics, Pregnancy, Gynecology